All Issue

2021 Vol.10, Issue 3
The Educational Use of Artificial Intelligence and the Task of Geography Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

4차 산업혁명 시대 인공지능의 교육적 활용과 지리교육의 과제

김민성
2021. pp. 329~345
PDF Citation
Abstract
Sorry, not available.
Click the PDF button.
References
  1. 강영옥･조나혜･박소연･김지연, 2021, “합성곱신경망을 활용한 SNS 사진 분류 및 관광객과 거주자의 관광 활동 특성 분석,” 대한지리학회지, 56(3), 247-264.
  2. 강영옥･조나혜･이주윤･윤지영･이혜진, 2019, “경험적 모델과 머신러닝 기법을 활용한 SNS 사용자 분류방법 비교: 플리커 데이터의 관광객 분류방법,” 대한공간정보학회지, 27(4), 29-37.
  3. 김길수, 2019, “공공부문에서 인공지능 활용에 관한 연구,” 한국자치행정학보, 33(1), 27-47.
  4. 김경일, 2017, ｢지혜의 심리학｣, 서울: 진성북스.
  5. 김민성, 2013, “교사들이 인지하는 고등학생들의 한국지리 오개념,” 대한지리학회지, 48(3), 482-496.
  6. 김민성, 2016, “로우테크 원격탐사 활동의 교육적 효과: 비판적 공간사고력을 중심으로,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 24(4), 115-130.
  7. 김영훈, 2019, “국토공간분석을 위한 인공지능 기법의 가능성 탐색,” 국토, 451, 94-95.
  8. 김현진･박정호･홍선주･박연정･김은영･최정윤･김유리, 2020, “학교교육에서 AI 활용에 대한 교사의 인식,” 교육공학연구, 36(3), 905-930.
  9. 모윤하, 2020, “디지털 스토리텔링을 위한 챗봇 개발,” 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  10. 박지만･조두영･이상선･이민섭･남한식･양혜림, 2018, “인공지능과 국토정보를 활용한 노인복지 취약지구 추출방법에 관한 연구,” 지적과 국토정보, 48(1), 169-186.
  11. 박지수, 2021, “빅데이터 기반 사회과 핵심역량 도출과 평가도구 개발 및 검증: 지리 영역을 중심으로,” 부산대학교 박사학위논문.
  12. 박찬･김병석･전수연･전은경･홍수빈･진성임･문혜진･김성빈･정선재･강윤진･변문경･권해연･박서희･이정훈, 2020, ｢4차산업혁명시대 인공지능 융합교육법: 우리아이 AI｣, 서울: 다빈치books.
  13. 신동광, 2019, “영어 쓰기 능력 향상을 위한 AI 챗봇 활용 방안 탐색,” 교원교육, 35(1), 41-55.
  14. 이주호･정제영･정영식, 2021, ｢AI 교육혁명｣, 서울: 시원북스.
  15. 조원호･임용호･박기호, 2019, “합성곱 신경망을 이용한 딥러닝 기반의 토지피복 분류: 한국 토지피복을 대상으로,” 대한지리학회지, 54(1), 1-16.
  16. 최서원･남재현, 2019, “SW 교육 보조 도구로서의 AI 챗봇 활용,” 한국정보통신학회논문지, 23(12), 1693-1699.
  17. 홍정민, 2021, ｢에듀테크의 미래｣, 서울: 책밥.
  18. 황규호, 2020, “포스트 코로나 시대 국가교육과정의 과제,” 교육과정연구, 38(4), 83-106.
  19. 황홍섭, 2019, “빅데이터를 활용한 사회과 교수학습 모형의 탐색,” 사회과교육, 58(1), 63-98.
  20. Ahmad, M.F. and Ghapar, W.R.G.W.A., 2019, The era of artificial intelligence in Malaysian higher education: Impact and challenges in tangible mixed-reality learning system toward self exploration education (SEE), Procedia Computer Science, 163, 2-10.
  21. Alkhatlan, A. and Kalita, J., 2019, Intelligent tutoring systems: A comprehensive historical survey with recent developments, International Journal of Computer Applications, 181(43), 1-20.
  22. Asif, R., Merceron, A., Ali, S.A., and Haider, N.G., 2017, Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining, Computers & Education, 113, 177-194.
  23. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., and The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt, 2005, Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3-4), 363-392.
  24. Biswas, G., Segedy, J.R., and Bunchongchit, K., 2016, From design to implementation to practice a learning by teaching system: Betty’s Brain, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 350-364.
  25. Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., and Blakemore, M., 2020, AI in education: Learner choice and fundamental rights, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 312-324.
  26. Bringula, R.P., Fosgate Jr, I.C.O., Garcia, N.P.R., and Yorobe, J.L.M., 2018, Effects of pedagogical agents on students’ mathematics performance: A comparison between two versions, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 701-722.
  27. Carbonell, J.R., 1970, AI in CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction, IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11(4), 190-202.
  28. Chen, L., Chen, P., and Lin, Z., 2020, Artificial intelligence in education: A review, IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.
  29. Chou, C.Y. and Chan, T.W., 2016, Reciprocal tutoring: Design with cognitive load sharing, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 512-535.
  30. Crevier, D., 1993, AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence, NY: Basic Books.
  31. D’Mello, S.K. and Graesser, A., 2010, Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 20(2), 147-187.
  32. D’Mello, S.K. and Graesser, A., 2013, AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(4), 1-39.
  33. D’Mello, S.K., Picard, R.W., and Graesser, A., 2007, Toward an affect-sensitive AutoTutor, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(4), 53-61.
  34. du Boulay, B., 2016, Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76-81.
  35. du Boulay, B., 2019, Escape from the Skinner Box: The case for contemporary intelligent learning environments, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2902-2919.
  36. Fischer, C., Pardos, Z.A., Baker, R.S., Williams, J.J., Smyth, P., Yu, R., Slater, S., Baker, R., and Warschauer, M., 2020, Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges, Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 130-160.
  37. Goldsmith, A.S. and Emrick, B.C., 2019, ASSISTments Cross-Platform Mobile App, retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/213002639.pdf
  38. Graesser, A.C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B.C., and Olney, A., 2005a, AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 612-618.
  39. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., and VanLehn, K., 2005b, Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART, Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 225-234.
  40. Heffernan, N.T. and Heffernan, C.L., 2014, The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470-497.
  41. Heffernan, N.T., Turner, T.E., Lourenco, A.L., Macasek, M.A., Nuzzo-Jones, G., and Koedinger, K.R., 2006, The ASSISTment builder: Towards an analysis of cost effectiveness of ITS creation, Flairs Conference, 515-520.
  42. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., and Fadel, C., 2019, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching & Learning, Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign(정제영･이선복 역, 2020, ｢인공지능 시대의 미래교육: 가르침과 배움의 함의｣, 서울: 박영story).
  43. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., and Aleven, V., 2018, Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms, in Rosé, C.P., Martínez-Maldonado, R., Hoppe, H.U., Luckin, R., Mavrikis, M., Porayska-Pomsta, K., McLaren, B., and du Boulay, B., eds., Artificial Intelligence in Education, Cham: Springer, 154-168.
  44. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., and Aleven, V., 2019, Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity, Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27-52.
  45. Ideland, M., 2021, Google and the end of the teacher? How a figuration of the teacher is produced through an ed-tech discourse, Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 33-46.
  46. Janowicz, K., Gao, S., McKenzie, G., Hu, Y., and Bhaduri, B., 2020, GeoAI: Spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(4), 625-636.
  47. Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., and Goldstein, D.S., 2013, Estimating the effect of web-based homework, in Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., and Pavlik, P., eds., Artificial Intelligence in Education, Berlin: Springer, 824-827.
  48. Kinnebrew, J.S., Segedy, J.R., and Biswas, G., 2015, Integrating model-driven and data-driven techniques for analyzing learning behaviors in open-ended learning environments, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 140-153.
  49. Knox, J., 2020, Artificial intelligence and education in China, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298-311.
  50. Knox, J., Williamson, B., and Bayne, S., 2020, Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‘learnification’ and ‘datafication’ across humans and digital technologies, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31-45.
  51. Koedinger, K.R., McLaughlin, E.A., and Heffernan, N.T., 2010, A quasi-experimental evaluation of an on-line formative assessment and tutoring system, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 489-510.
  52. Kural, M. and Kocakülah, M.S., 2016, Teaching for hot conceptual change: Towards a new model, beyond the cold and warm ones, European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8), 1-40.
  53. Leelawong, K. and Biswas, G., 2008, Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181-208.
  54. Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S.J.H., Ogata, H., Baltes. J., Guerra, R., Li, P., and Tsai, C.C., 2020, Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 580820.
  55. Luckin, R. and Cukurova, M., 2019, Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences- driven approach, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838.
  56. Mason, L., Gava, M., and Boldrin, A., 2008, On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest, Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291-309.
  57. McStay, A., 2020, Emotional AI and EdTech: Serving the public good?, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 270-283.
  58. Mendicino, M., Razzaq, L., and Heffernan, N.T., 2009, A comparison of traditional homework to computer- supported homework, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 331-359.
  59. Morgan, J. and Lambert, D., 2005, Geography: Teaching School Subjects 11-19, NY: Routledge.
  60. Nye, B.D., Graesser, A.C., and Hu, X., 2014, AutoTutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 427-469.
  61. Pareto, L., 2014, A teachable agent game engaging primary school children to learn arithmetic concepts and reasoning, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 251-283.
  62. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., and Boyle, R.A., 1993, Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change, Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
  63. Rajendran, R., Iyer, S., and Murthy, S., 2018, Personalized affective feedback to address students’ frustration in ITS, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(1), 87-97.
  64. Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R.F., and Mason, C.A., 2016, Online mathematics homework increases student achievement, AERA Open, 2(4), 1-12.
  65. Romero, C. and Ventura, S., 2010, Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6), 601-618.
  66. Scheuer, O. and McLaren, B.M., 2012, Educational data mining, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 1075-1079.
  67. Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., and Sancho-Gil, J.M., 2020, What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1-6.
  68. Tan, J., Beers, C.D., Gupta, R., and Biswas, G., 2005, Computer games as intelligent learning environments: A river ecosystem adventure, Artificial Intelligence in Education, 646-653.
  69. Timms, M.J., 2016, Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: Educational cobots and smart classrooms, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712.
  70. Williamson, B., 2020, New digital laboratories of experimental knowledge production: Artificial intelligence and education research, London Review of Education, 18(2), 209-220.
  71. Williamson, B. and Eynon, R., 2020, Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235.
  72. Wilson, C. and Scott, B., 2017, Adaptive systems in education: A review and conceptual unification, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(1), 2-19.
  73. Yannier, N., Hudson, S.E., and Koedinger, K.R., 2020, Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 74-96.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 10
  • No :3
  • Pages :329~345
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.10.3.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close