All Issue

2019 Vol.8, Issue 1
The Meaning of Embodied Cognition and Its Applications in Geography Education

체화된 인지의 의미와 지리교육에서의 활용

김민성
2019. pp. 1~18
PDF Citation
Abstract
Sorry, not available.
Click the PDF button.
References
  1. 김민경･이지영, 2017, “체화된 인지와 창의･융합적 관점에서의 수학 수업의 교육적 의의 탐색,” 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(9), 247-271.
  2. 김지숙･김지호, 2013, “손 씻기에 체화된 인지(EC)가 소비행동에 미치는 영향,” 한국심리학회지: 소비자･광고, 14(2), 321-342.
  3. 김화경, 2008, “거북 마이크로월드에서 곡선의 행동 표현,” 교육과정평가연구, 11(1), 187-204.
  4. 안진환･박슬라 역, 2007, ｢스틱!: 뇌리에 착 달라붙는 메시지의 힘｣, 서울: 웅진씽크빅.
  5. 이경식 역, 2013, ｢승자의 뇌｣, 서울: 알에이치코리아.
  6. 이정모, 2010, “‘체화된 인지(embodied cognition)’ 접근과 학문간 융합: 인지과학 새 패러다임과 철학의 연결이 주는 시사,” 철학사상, 38, 27-66.
  7. 이지윤･조한혁･송민호, 2013, “공간 시각화 과제에 체화된 거북 스킴 적용에 관한 연구,” 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A: 수학교육, 52(2), 191-201.
  8. 한승희･차운아, 2014, “손을 움켜쥐면 경제적 선택에 대한 인내심이 높아질까?: 체화된 자기 조절이 지연 보상 선택에 미치는 효과,” 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 15(1), 199-215.
  9. Adams, P.C., 1998, Teaching and learning with SimCity, Journal of Geography, 97(2), 47-55.
  10. Alibali, M.W. and Nathan, M.J., 2012, Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247-286.
  11. Annetta, L.A., 2008, Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used, Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 229-239.
  12. Bai, X. and Black, J.B., 2010, Enhancing intelligent tutoring systems with the agent paradigm, in Information Resources Management Association, ed., Gaming and Simulations: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 440-463.
  13. Bara, F., Gentaz, E., Colé, P., and Sprenger-Charolles, L., 2004, The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children’s understanding of the alphabetic principle, Cognitive Development, 19(3), 433-449.
  14. Barab, S.A. and Dodge, T., 2008, Strategies for designing embodied curriculum, in Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., van Merriënboer, J., and Driscoll, M.P., eds., Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 97-110.
  15. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., and Tuzun, H., 2005, Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86-107.
  16. Barsalou, L.W., 1999, Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.
  17. Barsalou, L.W., 2008, Grounded cognition, Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 1-21.
  18. Bergen, B. and Fledman, J., 2008, Embodied concept learning, in Calvo, P. and Gomila, A., eds., Handbook of Cognitive Science, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 313-331.
  19. Bessière, K., Seay, A.F., and Kiesler, S., 2007, The ideal elf: Identity exploration in world of warcraft, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 530-535.
  20. Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J.S., Sulcer, B., and Roscoe, R., 2010, Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 123-152.
  21. Biswas, G., Leeawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., and the Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt, 2005, Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software, Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 19(3-4), 363-392.
  22. Black, J.B., 2010, An embodied/grounded cognition perspective on educational technology, in Khine, M.S. and Saleh, I.M., eds., New Science of Learning, New York: Springer, 45-52.
  23. Blaut, J.M. and Stea, D., 1974, Mapping at the age of three, Journal of Geography, 73(7), 5-9.
  24. Blaut, J.M., Stea, D., Spencer, C., and Blades, M., 2003, Mapping as a cultural and cognitive universal, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 165-185.
  25. Bodenheimer, B., Williams, B., Kramer, M.R., Viswanath, K., Balachandran, R., Belynne, K., and Biswas, G., 2009, Construction and evaluation of animated teachable agents, Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 191-205.
  26. Brooks, F.P., Ouh-Young, M., Battert, J.J., and Kilpatrick, P.J., 1990, Project GROPE-haptic displays for scientific visualization, ACM Computer Graphics, 24(4), 177-185.
  27. Brunyé, T.T. and Taylor, H.A., 2009, When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal-oriented environments, Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 700-712.
  28. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G.R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R.J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., and Freund, H.-J., 2001, Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in somatotopic manner: An fMRI study, European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400-404.
  29. Casey, B., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J.E., Samper, A., and Copley, J., 2008, The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities, Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269-309.
  30. Chase, C.C., Chin, D.B., Oppezzo, M.A., and Schwartz, D.L., 2009, Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334-352.
  31. Clark, A. and Chalmers, D., 1998, The extended mind, Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
  32. Colella, V., 2000, Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471-500.
  33. Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z., and Goldin-Meadow, S., 2008, Gesturing makes learning last, Cognition, 106(2), 1047-1058.
  34. Cook, S.W., Yip, T.K., and Goldin-Meadow, S., 2010, Gesturing makes memories that last, Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 465-475.
  35. Davis, B. and the Spatial Reasoning Study Group, 2015, Spatial Reasoning in the Early Years: Principles, Assertions, and Speculations, New York: Routledge.
  36. DeMers, M.N., 2010, Second Life as a surrogate for experiential learning, International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(2), 17-31.
  37. Eflin, J. and Sheaffer, A.L., 2006, Service-learning in watershed-based initiatives: Keys to education for sustainability in geography? Journal of Geography, 105(1), 33-44.
  38. Ehrlich, S., Levine, S., and Goldin-Meadow, S., 2006, The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning, Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1259-1268.
  39. Ehrsson, H.H., Geyer, S., and Naito, E., 2003, Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations, Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(5), 3304-3316.
  40. Farnsworth, B.E., 2011, Conservation photography as environmental education: Focus on the pedagogues, Environmental Education Research, 17(6), 769-787.
  41. Fay, A.J. and Maner, J.K., 2012, Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1369-1372.
  42. Ferrara, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N.S., Golinkoff, R.M., and Lam, W.S., 2011, Block talk: Spatial language during block play, Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 143-151.
  43. Gaber, J., 2007, Simulating planning: SimCity as a pedagogical tool, Journal of Planning and Education and Research, 27(2), 113-121.
  44. Gallese, V., 2003, The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 517-528.
  45. Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G., 2005, The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455-479.
  46. Glenberg, A.M., 2008, Embodiment for education, in Calvo, P. and Gomila, A., eds., Handbook of Cognitive Science, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 355-372.
  47. Glenberg, A.M., 2010, Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 586-596.
  48. Glenberg, A.M., Brown, M., and Levin, J.R., 2007, Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 389-399.
  49. Glenberg, A.M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J.R. Japuntich, S., and Kaschak, M.P., 2004, Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424-436.
  50. Goldin-Meadow, S., 2000, Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners, Child Development, 71(1), 231-239.
  51. Goldin-Meadow, S., 2003, Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  52. Goldin-Meadow, S., 2007, Pointing sets the stage for learning language-and creating language, Child Development, 78(3), 741-745.
  53. Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S.W., and Mitchell, Z.A., 2009, Gesturing gives children new ideas about math, Psychological Science, 20(3), 267-272.
  54. Goldin-Meadow, S. and Wagner, S.M., 2005, How our hands help us learn, Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(5), 234-241.
  55. Goldstone, R., Landy, D., and Son, J.Y., 2008, A well- grounded education: The role of perception in science and mathematics, in de Vega, M., Glenberg, A.M., and Graesser, A.C., eds., Symbols, Embodiment and Meaning: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, New York: Oxford University Press, 327-256.
  56. Gredler, M.E., 1996, Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a (research) paradigm, in Jonassen, D.H. and Association for Educational Communications and Technology, eds., Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New York: Macmillan Library Reference, 521-540.
  57. Griffin, M.M., 1995, You can’t get there from here: Situated learning, transfer and map skills, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(1), 65-87.
  58. Griffin, S., 2000, Number Worlds: Preschool Level, Durham, NH: Number Worlds Alliance.
  59. Hall, R. and Nemirovsky, R., 2012, Introduction to the special issues: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207-215.
  60. Han, I., 2013, Embodiment: A new perspective for evaluating physicality in learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 41-59.
  61. Han, I. and Black, J.B., 2011, Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics, Computers & Education, 57(4), 2281-2290.
  62. Hostetter, A.B. and Alibali, M.W., 2008, Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495-514.
  63. Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., and Batty, M., 2009, NeoGeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications, Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 118-145.
  64. IJzerman, H. and Semin, G.R., 2009, The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature, Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214-1220.
  65. Jones, M.G., Minogue, J., Tretter, T.R., Negishi, A., and Taylor, R., 2006, Haptic augmentation of science instruction: Does touch matter? Science Education, 90(1), 111-123.
  66. Kaschak, M.P., Madden, C.J., Therriault, D.J., Yaxley, R.H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A.A., and Zwaan, R.A., 2005, Perception of motion affects language processing, Cognition, 94(3), B79-B89.
  67. Kendon, A., 1980, Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance, in Key, M.R., ed., Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, The Hague: Mounton Publisher, 207-228.
  68. Kim, K., Kim, M., Shin, J., and Ryu, J., 2015, Eye movement analysis of students' active examination strategy and its transfer in visuospatial representations, Journal of Geography, 114(4), 146-157.
  69. Kim, K. and Kim, M., 2018, Effects of task demand and familiarity with scenes in visuospatial representations on the perception and processing of spatial information, Journal of Geography, 117(5), 193-204.
  70. Kim, M., Cho, D., Lee, S.-I., and Shin, J., 2017, The development and applicability of a web-based time-geographic visualization tool, Geography, 102(2), 71-78.
  71. Kim, M. and Shin, J., 2016, The pedagogical benefits of SimCity in urban geography education, Journal of Geography, 115(2), 39-50.
  72. Klein, A. and Starkey, P., 2004, Fostering preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: Findings from the Berkeley Math Readiness Project, in Clements, D.H. and Sarama, J., eds., Engaging Young Children in Mathematics: Standards for Early Mathematics Education, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 343-360.
  73. Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G., and Thompson, W., 2001, Neural foundations of imagery, Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 2(9), 635-642.
  74. Kulhavy, R.W. and Stock, W.A., 1996, How cognitive maps are learned and remembered, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(1), 123-145.
  75. Kwan, M.-P., 2007, Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion, The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 22-34.
  76. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  77. Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R.E., 1997, The metaphorical structure of mathematics: Sketching out cognitive foundations for a mind-based mathematics, in English, L.D., ed., Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 21-89.
  78. Landau, M.J., Vess, M., Arndt, J., Rothschild, Z.K., Sullivan, D., and Atchley, R.A., 2011, Embodied metaphor and the “true” self: Priming entity expansion and protection influences intrinsic self-expressions in self-perceptions and interpersonal behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 79-87.
  79. Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hülsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., Birbaumer, N., and Grodd, W., 1999, Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 491-501.
  80. Matlock, T., 2004, Fictive motion as cognitive simulation, Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389-1400.
  81. McClain, L.R. and Zimmerman, H.T., 2016, Technology-mediated engagement with nature: Sensory and social engagement with the outdoors supported through an e-Trailguide, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(4), 385-399.
  82. Meier, B.P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., and Bargh, J.A., 2012, Embodiment in social psychology, Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705-716.
  83. Minnery, J. and Searle, G., 2014, Toying with the city? Using the computer game SimCityTM4 in planning education, Planning, Practice & Research, 29(1), 44-55.
  84. Montello, D.R., 2005, Navigation, in Shah, P. and Miyake, A., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, New York: Cambridge University Press, 257-294.
  85. Morris, R.V., 2008, Ice and sand: Linking the sandbox to geographic features in elementary social studies classrooms, International Journal of Social Education, 23(2), 35-44.
  86. Nath, S. and Szücs, D., 2014, Construction play and cognitive skills associated with the development of mathematical abilities in 7-year-old children, Learning and Instruction, 32, 73-80.
  87. Neulight, N., Kafai, Y.B., Kao, L., Foley, B., and Galas, C., 2007, Children’s participation in a virtual epidemic in the science classroom: Making connections to natural infectious diseases, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 47-58.
  88. Nori, R. and Giusberti, F., 2006, Predicting cognitive styles from spatial abilities, American Journal of Psychology, 119(1), 67-86.
  89. Nyberg, L., Petersson, K.M., Nilsson, L.-G., Sandblom, J., Åberg, C., and Ingvar, M., 2001, Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions, NeuroImage, 14(2), 521-528.
  90. Papert, S., 1980, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, New York: Basic Books.
  91. Pieters, R. and Wedel, M., 2007, Goal control of attention to advertising: The Yarbus implication, Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 224-233.
  92. Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., and Hummel, F., 2001, Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing, Brain and Language, 78(2), 143-168.
  93. Ramani, G.B. and Siegler, R.S., 2008, Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games, Child Development, 79(2), 375-394.
  94. Reiner, M., 1999, Conceptual construction of fields through tactile interface, Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1), 31-35.
  95. Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M.A., 1998, Language within our group, Trends in Neurosciences, 21(5), 188-194.
  96. Root-Bernstine, R.S. and Root-Bernstine, M.M., 2001, Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World’s Most Creative People, New York: Mariner Books.
  97. Sauter, M., Uttal, D.H., Alman, A.S., Goldwin-Meadow, S., and Levine, S.C., 2012, Learning what children know about space from looking at their hands: The added value of gesture in spatial communication, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 587-606.
  98. Schwartz, D.L., Blair, K.P., Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., and Davis, J., 2008, Animations of thought: Interactivity in teachable agent paradigm, in Lowe, R. and Schnotz, W., eds., Learning with Animation: Research and Implications for Design, New York: Cambridge University Press, 114-140.
  99. Schwartz, N.H. and Phillippe, A.E., 1991, Individual differences in the retention of maps, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(1), 72-85.
  100. Sfard, A., 1998, On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
  101. Shapiro, L., 2011, Embodied Cognition, New York: Routledge.
  102. Shepard, R.N. and Metzler, J., 1971, Mental rotation of three dimensional objects, Science, 171(3972), 701-703.
  103. Stanfield, R.A. and Zwaan, R.A., 2001, The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition, Psychological Science, 12(2), 153-156.
  104. Verdine, B.N., Golinkoff, R.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., and Newcombe, N.S., 2014, Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 7-13.
  105. Williams, L.E., Huang, J.Y., and Bargh, J.A., 2009, The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world, European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257- 1267.
  106. Williams, L.E. and Bargh, J.A., 2008, Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth, Science, 322(5901), 606-607.
  107. Williams II, R.L., He, X., Franklin, T., and Wang, S., 2007, Haptic-augmented engineering mechanics educational tools, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6(1), 1-4.
  108. Yaxley, R.H. and Zwaan, R.A., 2007, Simulating visibility during language comprehension, Cognition, 105(1), 229-236.
  109. Zhong, C.-B. and Leonardelli, G.J., 2008, Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?, Psychological Science, 19(9), 838-842.
  110. Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J., Yaxley, R.H., and Aveyard, M.E., 2004, Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension, Cognitive Science, 28(4), 611-619.
  111. Zwaan, R.A., Stanfield, R.A., and Yaxley, R.H., 2002, Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects, Psychological Science, 13(2), 168-171.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 8
  • No :1
  • Pages :1~18
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.8.1.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close