All Issue

2023 Vol.12, Issue 3 Preview Page

Research Article

An Analysis of Ecological Citizenship Research Trends: Focusing on Semantic Network Analysis

생태시민성에 대한 국내 연구 동향 분석: 언어 네트워크 분석을 중심으로

김병연1†

Byungyeon Kim1†

1대구 다사고등학교 교사/대구대학교 지리교육과 겸임교수
1Teacher, Daegu Dasa High School/Adjunct Professor, Department of Geography Education, Daegu University
30 September 2023. pp. 401~414
PDF Citation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the trend of academic research on ecological citizenship in Korea using semantic network analysis. For the study, 55 research papers on eco-citizenship were selected among 98 papers conducted in Korea over the past 15 years, and key keywords were selected through a word refinement process from the title, abstract, and key words of the paper. The analysis results of this study are as follows. First, Most studies on eco-citizenship are conducted only in relation to the development of students’ awareness and practical competency in an educational context, and no research has been conducted targeting teachers. Second, keywords such as education, ecology, and society were playing a role as hubs in the semantic network as the frequency of occurrence, degree centrality, eigenvector centrality, centrality of between, and closeness centrality were all high. Third, keywords such as ‘relationship’, ‘practice’, and ‘human’ have higher centrality compared to their frequency of occurrence, indicating that they are highly influential keywords within the semantic network. Fourth, it was confirmed that climate change, environmental education, and problems were not dealt with as important topics in ecological citizenship research because the centrality of keywords was low compared to the frequency of occurrence.
Keywords
Ecological citizenship
Ecological citizenship studies
Cultivating competecne of ecological citizen
Semantic network analysis
Research trend
본 연구는 언어네트워크 분석을 활용하여 국내 생태시민성에 대한 학술 연구의 동향을 분석하는 데 목적을 두고 있다. 연구를 위해 지난 15년간 국내에서 이루어져 온 98편의 논문 중 55편의 생태시민성에 대한 연구 논문을 선정하고, 논문의 제목, 초록, 핵심어로부터 단어 정제 과정을 거쳐 핵심 키워드를 선정하였다. 본 연구의 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 생태시민성 연구가 대부분 교육적 맥락 속에서 학생들을 대상으로 한 생태시민의 인식 및 실천 역량 함양과 관련한 실행 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있는 반면, 예비 및 현직 교사 교육과 관련한 실행연구는 거의 이루어지지 않았다. ‘교육’, ‘생태’, ‘사회’와 같은 키워드는 의미연결망에서 중심적인 역할을 하고 있었고, ‘관계’, ‘실천’, ‘인간’ 등과 같은 키워드의 경우 출현빈도에 비하여 키워드의 중심성이 높게 나타나고 있어 의미연결망 내에서 영향력이 크다는 점을 알 수 있었다. 또한 ‘기후변화’, ‘환경교육’, ‘문제’ 등은 출현빈도에 비하여 키워드의 중심성이 낮아 생태시민성 연구에서 중요한 주제로 다루어지고 있지 못함을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 연구결과는 향후 생태시민성 연구의 방향에 의미있는 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.
키워드
생태시민성
생태시민성 연구
생태시민의 역량 함양
언어네트워크 분석
연구 동향
References
  1. 김경은, 2020, “언어 네트워크 분석을 활용한 사회과 평가연구 분석,” 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(6), 525-549.
  2. 김병연, 2011, “생태 시민성 논의의 지리과 환경 교육적 함의. 한국지리환경교육학회지,” 19(2), 221-234. 10.17279/jkagee.2011.19.2.221
  3. 김병연, 2022, “물질적/존재론적 전환의 관점에서 생태시민(성)을 다시 사유하기,” 한국지역지리학회지, 28(1), 133-150. 10.26863/JKARG.2022.2.28.1.133
  4. 김영우, 2017, ｢Do it! 쉽게 배우는 R 데이터 분석｣, 파주: 이지스퍼블리싱.
  5. 박순열, 2010, “생태시티즌십(ecological citizenship) 논의의 쟁점과 한국적 함의,” 환경사회학연구, ECO, 14(1), 167-194.
  6. 신소영･김민정, 2021, “비형식 학습으로의 대학 온라인 교육콘텐츠 활용에 대한 의미연결망 분석,” 열린교육연구, 29(4), 83-105.
  7. 이동민, 2020, “국내 지리교사에 대한 연구 동향 분석,” 사회과교육연구, 27(3), 33-56.
  8. 이수상, 2012, ｢네트워크 분석 방법론｣, 서울: 논형.
  9. 이수상, 2014, “언어 네트워크 분석 방법을 활용한 학술 논문의 내용분석,” 정보관리학회지, 31(4), 49-68. 10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  10. 조영아, 2021, “키워드 네트워크 분석을 활용한 [진로교육연구] 연구동향 분석: 진로교육정책 주요 시기별 비교를 중심으로,” 진로교육연구, 34(3), 43-66. 10.32341/JCER.2021.9.34.3.43
  11. 유네스코, 2022, ｢함께 그려보는 우리의 미래: 교육을 위한 새로운 사회 계약｣, 서울: 유네스코 아시아태평양 국제이해교육원.
  12. 허경숙, 2021, “의미연결망 분석을 활용한 문화예술교육의 연구 동향 분석,” 문화예술교육연구, 16(5), 57-88.
  13. Barry, J., 1999, Rethinking Green Politics, London: Sage.
  14. Bullen, A. and Whitehead, M., 2005, Negotiating the networks of space, time and substance: A geographical perspective on the sustainable citizen, Citizenship Studies, 9(5), 499-516. 10.1080/13621020500301270
  15. Carlson, M. and Jensen, B., 2006, Encouraging environmental citizenship: The roles and challenges for schools. in Dobson, A and Bell, D., eds., Environmental Citizenship, Cambridge: MIT Press, 237-261.
  16. Carter, N. and Huby, M., 2005, Ecological citizenship and ethical investment, Environmental Politics, 14(2), 256-267. 10.1080/09644010500055159
  17. Christoff, P., 1996, Ecological citizens and ecologically guided democracy, in Doherty, B and de Geus, M., eds., Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship, London: Routledge, 151-69.
  18. Dobson, A., 2003, Citizenship and the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199258449.001.0001
  19. Dobson, A., 2006, Ecological citizenship: A Defence, Environmental Politics, 15(3), 447-451. 10.1080/09644010600627766
  20. Dobson, A., 2007, Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development, Sustainable Development, 15, 276-285. 10.1002/sd.344
  21. Dobson, A. and Sáiz, A.V., 2005, Introduction, Environmental Politics, 14(2), 157-162. 10.1080/09644010500054822
  22. Dobson, A. and Bell, D., 2006, Environmental Citizenship, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  23. Eckersley, R., 2004, The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001
  24. Gabrielson, T., 2008, Green citizenship: A review and critique. Citizenship Studies, 12(4) 429-446. 10.1080/13621020802184275
  25. Gough, S. and S. William., 2006, Promoting environmental citizenship through learning: Towards a theory of change. in Dobson, A and Bell, D.. eds., Environmental Citizenship, Cambridge: MIT Press, 263-283.
  26. Hailwood, S., 2005, Environmental citizenship as reasonable citizenship, Environmental Politics, 14(2), 195-2010. 10.1080/09644010500054921
  27. Hayward, T., 2006, Ecological citizenship: Justice, rights and the virtue of resourcefulness, Environmental Politics, 15(3), 435-46. 10.1080/09644010600627741
  28. Horton, D., 2006, Demonstrating environmental citizenship? A study of everyday life among green activists. in Dobson, A and Bell, D.. eds., Environmental Citizenship, Cambridge: MIT Press, 127-150.
  29. Jagers, S.C., 2009, In search of the ecological citizen, Environmental Politics, 18(1), 18-36. 10.1080/09644010802624751
  30. Jagers, S.C., and Matti, S., 2010, Ecological citizens: Identifying values and beliefs that support individual environmental responsibility among Swedes, Sustainability, 2(4), 1055-1079. 10.3390/su2041055
  31. Jagers, S.C., Martinsson, J., and Matti, S., 2014, Ecological citizenship: A driver of pro-environmental behaviour?, Environmental Politics, 23(3), 434-453. 10.1080/09644016.2013.835202
  32. Kennedy, E.H., 2011, Rethinking ecological citizenship: the role of neighbourhood networks in cultural change, Environmental Politics, 20(6), 843-860. 10.1080/09644016.2011.617169
  33. Latta, A., 2007, Locating democratic politics in ecological citizenship, Environmental Politics, 16(3), 377-393. 10.1080/09644010701251631
  34. Latta A., 2014, Matter, politics and the sacred: Insurgent ecologies of citizenship, Cultural Geographies, 21(3), 323-341. 10.1177/1474474013495642
  35. Latour, B., 2004, The Politics of Nature: How to Bring Science into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  36. Light, A. 2006. Ecological citizenship: The democratic promiseof restoration. in Platt, R., eds. The humane metropolis: people and nature in the 21st century city. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, 169-182.
  37. Linklater, A., 1998, Cosmopolitan citizenship, Citizenship studies, 2(1), 23-41. 10.1080/13621029808420668
  38. Mason, K., 2014, Becoming citizen green: Prefigurative politics, autonomous geographies, and hoping against hope. Environmental Politics, 23(1) 140-158. 10.1080/09644016.2013.775725
  39. Martinsson, J. and Lundqvist, L.J. 2010, Ecological citizenship: Coming out “clean” without turning “green”?, Environmental Politics, 19(4), 518-37. 10.1080/09644016.2010.489709
  40. Seyfang, G., 2005, Shopping for sustainability: Can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship?, Environmental Politics, 14(2), 290-306. 10.1080/09644010500055209
  41. Seyfang, G., 2006, Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 383-395. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.003
  42. Spaargaren, G. and Mol, A.P.J., 2008, Greening global consumption: Redefining politics and authority, Global Environmental Change, 18, 350-359. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.010
  43. Seyfang, G., 2006. Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 383-395. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.003
  44. Smith, M.J., 1998, Ecologism: Towards Ecological Citizenship, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  45. Scoville, C., 2016, George orwell and ecological citizenship: Moral agency and modern estrangement, Citizenship Studies, 20(6), 830-845. 10.1080/13621025.2016.1192105
  46. Smith, M, 2005, Ecological citizenship and ethical responsibility: Arendt, Benjamin and political activism, Environments, 33(3), 51-53.
  47. Steward, F., 1991, Citizens of planet earth, in Andrews, G., eds., Citizenship, London: Lawrence and Wishart, 65-75.
  48. Valencia Sáiz, A., 2005, Globalisation, cosmopolitanism and ecological citizenship, Environmental Politics, 14(2), 163-78. 10.1080/09644010500054848
  49. Van Steenbergen, B., 1994, The Condition of Citizenship, London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446250600PMC264157
  50. Wolf, J.K. Brown and Conway, D., 2009, Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice, Environmental Politics, 18(4), 503-21. 10.1080/09644010903007377
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 12
  • No :3
  • Pages :401~414
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.12.3.2
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close