All Issue

2023 Vol.12, Issue 4

Research Article

Inequality in Virtual Fieldwork Space and Practical Alternatives: Create Virtual Fieldwork Space in Google Street View

가상 답사 공간 불균형에 대한 실천적 대안: 구글 스트리트 뷰로 가상 답사 공간 만들기

홍태완1†

Taewan Hong1†

1서울대학교 사범대학 사회교육과 지리전공 박사수료
1Doctoral Student, Geography Major, Department of Social Education, Seoul National University
31 December 2023. pp. 509~531
PDF Citation
Abstract
Google street view is a virtual fieldwork space developed to allow users to experience 360-degree street images remotely. As companies take the lead in spatial data production, street views are well established in areas that are easy to access and have high commercial value, but areas that are relatively less interesting and difficult to access are excluded from street views, making virtual fieldwork impossible. This gap in spatial data can affect the perception of a place by people conducting a virtual fieldwork through street view. In this study, we raise the issue of regional imbalance in virtual fieldwork space and propose alternatives that teachers can practice based on discussions on data activism to improve this. Among areas where virtual fieldwork through street view were difficult, places with educational value were selected and street view data was produced using images taken directly by teachers. A learning module was developed so that the virtual fieldwork space created in this way could be used for inquiry-based learning. This study is meaningful in that it presents specific strategies that can be implemented at the teacher level to address the structural imbalance problem of virtual fieldwork spaces.
Keywords
Virtual fieldwork space
Data activism
Google street view
360-degree images
구글 스트리트 뷰는 원격으로 360도 거리 이미지를 체험할 수 있도록 개발된 가상 답사 공간이다. 기업이 공간 데이터 생산을 주도함에 따라 접근이 쉽고 상업적 가치가 높은 지역은 스트리트 뷰가 잘 조성되었으나 상대적으로 관심이 적고 접근이 어려운 지역은 스트리트 뷰가 미비하여 가상 답사를 하기 어렵다. 이와 같은 공간 데이터의 공백은 스트리트 뷰를 통해 가상 답사를 하려는 사람들의 장소 인식에 영향을 줄 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 가상 답사 공간에서의 지역 간 불균형 문제를 제기하고 이를 개선하기 위해 데이터 행동주의의 논의를 바탕으로 교사가 실천할 수 있는 대안을 제안한다. 먼저 스트리트 뷰를 통해 가상 답사가 어려운 지역 중에서 교육적 가치가 있는 곳을 선정하여 교사가 직접 촬영한 이미지로 스트리트 뷰 데이터를 생산하였다. 이렇게 만들어진 가상 답사 공간이 탐구학습에서 활용할 수 있도록 학습모듈을 개발하였다. 이 연구는 가상 답사 공간의 구조적 불균형 문제에 대하여 교사 수준에서 실천할 수 있는 구체적인 방안을 제시한다는 점에서 의의가 있다.
키워드
가상 답사 공간
데이터 행동주의
구글 스트리트 뷰
360도 이미지
References
  1. 강대균, 2019, “비인만의 해안사구를 활용한 경관생태적 현장학습 프로그램 개발,” 한국지형학회지, 26(1), 121-131. 10.16968/JKGA.26.1.121
  2. 강지영･소경희, 2011, “국내 교육관련 실행연구(action research) 동향 분석,” 아시아교육연구, 12(3), 197-224. 10.15753/aje.2011.12.3.009
  3. 교육부, 2022, ｢사회과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2022-33호 별책 7)｣.
  4. 권치순･김장환, 2011, “과학관 현장학습 실태조사를 통한 과학 현장학습 활성화 방안,” 대한지구과학교육학회지, 4(2), 142-150.
  5. 김경남, 2003, “일제하 근대도시 인천에 관한 공문서,” 인천학연구, 2(1), 555-571.
  6. 김다정･전석주, 2014, “현장체험학습을 위한 가상학습 기반수업모형의 설계 및 적용,” 정보교육학회논문지, 18(1), 133-142. 10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.133
  7. 김민성, 2017, “공간적 시민성의 개념화와 적용: 장애인 시각에서 대구 근대화 골목 바라보기,” 한국지리학회지, 6(3), 339-354. 10.25202/JAKG.6.3.3
  8. 김민성, 2022, “목표기반시나리오를 활용한 인공지능 기반 지리 교수학습 전략 개발,” 한국지리학회지, 11(3), 271-286. 10.25202/JAKG.11.3.1
  9. 김민성･김종근, 2021, “탐구적, 다감각적 지리답사 전략-부산시 영도를 사례로,” 한국사진지리학회지, 31(1), 56-74.
  10. 김민성･유수진, 2014, “지리공간기술을 이용하는 목표기반시나리오 학습모듈 개발,” 사회과교육, 53(1), 79-93.
  11. 김시덕, 2019,｢갈등 도시｣, 경기도: 열린책들.
  12. 김시은･최승원, 2014, “하이퍼텍스트를 응용한 인터랙티브미디어 영상의 쌍방향성 연출,” 디지털디자인학연구, 14(3), 551-559. 10.17280/jdd.2014.14.3.055
  13. 김형보･윤진호, 2012, “포털사이트 로드뷰 이미지를 활용한 도시재생 측면 가로경관 특성 분석,” GRI 연구논총, 14(1), 279-304.
  14. 김희식, 2012, “20세기 인천의 도시화와 매춘문제 고찰: 끽동과 옐로우하우스를 중심으로,” 역사와경계, 85, 267-300.
  15. 배덕현, 2015, “사이버공간의 정의와 특징-몇 가지 사례를 중심으로,” 문화역사지리, 27(1), 129-143.
  16. 배성수, 2016, “1940년대 초 인천지역 화교사회의 동향: 인천광역시립박물관 소장 1942년 화교자료의 분석을 중심으로,” 인천학연구, 24, 79-121.
  17. 변종민, 2022, “예비교사를 위한 도시 지형답사 프로그램 개발,” 한국지리학회지, 11(3), 287-303. 10.25202/JAKG.11.3.2
  18. 양승영, 2012, “2012년도 한국고생물학회 추계학술답사: 태백지역 답사기,” 고생물학회지, 28(1-2), 183-185.
  19. 오선민･이종원, 2014, “중등학교 지리답사 연구-목적, 유형, 계획과 제약요소,” 한국지리환경교육학회지(구 지리환경교육), 22(1), 111-130. 10.17279/jkagee.2014.22.1.111
  20. 인천광역시교육청, 2023, ｢2023학년도 현장체험학습운영매뉴얼｣, 인천: 인천광역시교육청.
  21. 전종한, 2009, “도시 뒷골목의 ‘장소 기억’: 종로 피맛골의 사례,” 대한지리학회지, 44(6), 779-796.
  22. 정찬미･신동희, 2017, “교육 대상에 따른 야외 지질학 탐구 요소 특성 비교: 지질 답사 교육 사례를 중심으로,” 대한지구과학교육학회지, 10(3), 235-253.
  23. 정해용, 2021, “코로나/포스트 코로나 시대의 지리답사와 관련한 콘텐츠 구상 및 활용,” 한국지역지리학회지, 27(3), 308-318. 10.26863/JKARG.2021.8.27.3.308
  24. 최재영, 2013, “길찾기를 위한 지도 읽기에서의 중, 고등학생의 자기 위치화 능력,” 한국지리환경교육학회지 (구 지리환경교육), 21(1), 65-77.
  25. 허건욱, 2018, “중국 만주지역 역사답사기-심양, 집안, 단동, 대련 일대,” 역사교육논집, 69, 199-227. 10.17999/SOHE.2018.69.07
  26. 홍태완, 2019, “16세기 세계지도 문헌을 통해 본 마젤란의 세계일주의 지도학적 영향,” 지리교육논집, 63, 53-66.
  27. Alderman, D.H. and Inwood, J., 2014, Toward a pedagogy of Jim Crow: A geographic reading of The Green Book. Teaching ethnic geography in the 21st century, 68-78.
  28. Alvarez León, L.F., 2016, Property regimes and the commodification of geographic information: An examination of Google Street View, Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716637885. 10.1177/2053951716637885
  29. Alvarez Leon, L.F. and Quinn, S., 2019, The value of crowd sourced street-level imagery: Examining the shifting property regimes of OpenStreetCam and Mapillary, GeoJournal, 84, 395-414. 10.1007/s10708-018-9865-4
  30. Barrow, L.H., 2006, A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265-278. 10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
  31. Bos, D., Miller, S., and Bull, E., 2022, Using virtual reality (VR) for teaching and learning in geography: Fieldwork, analytical skills, and employability, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(3), 479-488. 10.1080/03098265.2021.1901867
  32. Campkin, B. and Ross, R., 2012, “Negotiating the City through Google Street View,” in Higgott, A. and Wray, T. eds., Camera Constructs: Photography, Architecture and the Modern City, Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 147-158.
  33. Cicognani, A., 1998, On the linguistic nature of cyberspace and virtual communities, Virtual reality, 3, 16-24. 10.1007/BF01409794
  34. Cinnamon, J., 2019, Visual Data Justice? Datafication of Urban Informality in South Africa using 360° Imaging Technologies, Development Informatics Working Paper 75, Manchester, UK: Centre for Development Informatics, University of Manchester. 10.2139/ssrn.3456196
  35. Cinnamon, J. and Gaffney, A., 2022, Do-it-yourself Street Views and the urban imaginary of Google Street View, Journal of Urban Technology, 29(3), 95-116. 10.1080/10630732.2021.1910467
  36. Cinnamon, J. and Jahiu, L., 2021, Panoramic street-level imagery in data-driven urban research: a comprehensive global review of applications, techniques, and practical considerations, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 10(7), 471. 10.3390/ijgi10070471
  37. Clausén Gull, I., Kapetanovic, S., Norman, Å., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Olsson, T. M., and Eninger, L., 2023, Neighborhood conditions in a Swedish context-Two studies of reliability and validity of virtual systematic social observation using Google Street View, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1020742. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.102074236777218PMC9911895
  38. Deng, M., Yang, W., Chen, C., Wu, Z., Liu, Y., and Xiang, C., 2021, Street-level solar radiation mapping and patterns profiling using Baidu Street View images, Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103289. 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103289
  39. Djouadi, M. and Kholladi, M. K., 2022, Improving street view image classification using pre-trained CNN model extracted features, Periodica Polytechnica Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 66(4), 370-379. 10.3311/PPee.19961
  40. Erickson, H.H., Watson, A.R., and Greene, J.P., 2022, An experimental evaluation of culturally enriching field trips, Journal of Human Resources, 1020-11242R1. 10.3368/jhr.1020-11242R1
  41. Fauchart, E., Bacache-Beauvallet, M., Bourreau, M., and Moreau, F., 2022, Do-It-Yourself or Do-It-Together: How digital technologies affect creating alone or with others?, Technovation, 112, 102412. 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102412
  42. Firomumwe, T., 2019, Experiences out of the Classroom: The importance of fieldwork in learning geography at secondary school, i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 14 (3), 16-24. 10.26634/jsch.14.3.15169
  43. Firomumwe, T., 2022, Exploring the opportunities of virtual fieldwork in teaching geography during covid-19 pandemic, International Journal of Geography and Geography Education, (45), 76-87. 10.32003/igge.973983
  44. Grossberg, L., 1994, Bringin’ it all back home-pedagogy and cultural studies, in Giroux, H. and McLaren, P., eds., Between Borders. London: Routledge, 1-25.
  45. Gryl, I. and Jekel, T., 2012, Re-centering geoinformation in secondary education: Toward a spatial citizenship approach, Cartographica, 47(1), 18-28. 10.3138/carto.47.1.18
  46. Guo, Z., 2013, Residential street parking and car ownership: a study of households with off-street parking in the New York City region, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(1), 32-48. 10.1080/01944363.2013.790100
  47. Gutiérrez, M., 2018, Data activism and social change, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-319-78319-2
  48. Habermas, J., 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  49. Han, I., 2021, Immersive virtual field trips and elementary students’ perceptions, British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 179-195. 10.1111/bjet.12946
  50. Han, X., Wang, L., Seo, S.H., He, J. and Jung, T., 2022, Measuring perceived psychological stress in urban built environments using Google Street View and deep learning, Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 891736. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.89173635646775PMC9131010
  51. Harley, J.B., 1989, Deconstructing the Map, Cartographica, 2(26), 1-20. 10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53
  52. Hong, S.Y., 2020, Linguistic landscapes on street-level images, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), 57. 10.3390/ijgi9010057
  53. Jiang, Z., Chen, L., Zhou, B., Huang, J., Xie, T., Fan, X., and Wang, C., 2020, itv: Inferring traffic violation-prone locations with vehicle trajectories and road environment data, IEEE Systems Journal, 15(3), 3913-3924. 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3012743
  54. Johns, J. and Phillips, R., 2012, Fieldwork for Human Geography, London: SAGE(박경환･윤희주･김나리･서태동 역, 2015, ｢지리답사란 무엇인가｣, 서울: 푸른길).
  55. Kang, Y., Kim, J., Park, J., and Lee, J., 2023, Assessment of perceived and physical walkability using street view images and deep learning technology, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(5), 186. 10.3390/ijgi12050186
  56. Khan, N., Muhammad, K., Hussain, T., Nasir, M., Munsif, M., Imran, A.S., and Sajjad, M., 2021, An adaptive game-based learning strategy for children road safety education and practice in virtual space, Sensors, 21(11), 3661. 10.3390/s2111366134070237PMC8197389
  57. Kim, M., 2022, Developing pre-service teachers’ fieldwork pedagogical and content knowledge through designing enquiry-based fieldwork, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(1), 61-79. 10.1080/03098265.2020.1849065
  58. Langton, S.H. and Steenbeek, W., 2017, Residential burglary target selection: An analysis at the property-level using Google Street View, Applied Geography, 86, 292-299. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.014
  59. Law, S., Seresinhe, C.I., Shen, Y., and Gutierrez-Roig, M., 2020, Street-Frontage-Net: Urban image classification using deep convolutional neural networks, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(4), 681-707. 10.1080/13658816.2018.1555832
  60. Lee, D.M., 2023, The potential and merits of narrative-based virtual fieldwork in preservice geography teacher education, Education Sciences, 13(3), 259. 10.3390/educsci13030259
  61. Li, M., Sheng, H., Irvin, J., Chung, H., Ying, A., Sun, T., and Rodriguez, D.A., 2023, Marked crosswalks in US transit-oriented station areas, 2007-2020: A computer vision approach using street view imagery, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(2), 350-369. 10.1177/23998083221112157
  62. Li, S. and Coleman, D., 2005, Modeling distributed GIS data production workflow, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(4), 401-424. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.002
  63. Li, X., Zhang, C., Li, W., Ricard, R., Meng, Q., and Zhang, W., 2015, Assessing street-level urban greenery using Google Street View and a modified green view index, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 675-685. 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
  64. Maddalena, E., Ibáñez, L.D., and Simperl, E., 2020, Mapping points of interest through street view imagery and paid crowdsourcing, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 11(5), 1-28. 10.1145/3403931
  65. Milson, A.J. and Alibrandi, M., 2008, Critical map literacy and geographic information systems: The spatial dimension of civic decision making, in VanFossen, P.J. and Berson, M.J., eds., The Electronic Republic? The Impact of Technology on Education for Citizenship, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 110-128.
  66. Mora, F., 2011, Innovating in the midst of crisis: A case study of Ushahidi, Submitted for publication to SAGE Convergence Journal, 3(5), 231-245.
  67. Novack, T., Vorbeck, L., Lorei, H., and Zipf, A., 2020, Towards detecting building facades with graffiti artwork based on street view images, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 98. 10.3390/ijgi9020098
  68. Odgers, C.L., Caspi, A., Bates, C.J., Sampson, R.J., and Moffitt, T.E., 2012, Systematic social observation of children’s neighborhoods using Google Street View: A reliable and cost‐effective method, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(10), 1009-1017. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02565.x22676812PMC3537178
  69. Ohta, H., 2001, A phenomenological approach to natural landscape cognition, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 387-403. 10.1006/jevp.2001.0233
  70. Oliver, K., 2001, Witnessing: Beyond recognition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  71. Oost, K., De Varies, B., and Van der Schee, J.A., 2011, Enquiry-driven fieldwork as a rich and powerful teaching strategy: School practices in secondary geography education in the Netherlands, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(4), 309-325. 10.1080/10382046.2011.619808
  72. Osipov, V.I., Larionov, V.I., Sushchev, S.P., Frolova, N.I., Ugarov, A.N., Kozharinov, S.V., and Barskaya, T.V., 2016, Seismic risk assessment for the Greater Sochi area, Water Resources, 43, 982-997. 10.1134/S0097807816070095
  73. Plascak, J.J., Rundle, A.G., Babel, R.A., Llanos, A.A., LaBelle, C.M., Stroup, A.M., and Mooney, S.J., 2020, Drop-and-spin virtual neighborhood auditing: Assessing built environment for linkage to health studies, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(1), 152-160. 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.03231862100PMC6927542
  74. Power, M.J., Neville, P., Devereux, E., Haynes, A., and Barnes, C., 2013, Why bother seeing the world for real?: Google Street View and the representation of a stigmatised neighbourhood, New Media & Society, 15(7), 1022-1040. 10.1177/1461444812465138
  75. Ringland, J., Bohm, M., and Baek, S.R., 2019, Characterization of food cultivation along roadside transects with Google Street View imagery and deep learning, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 158, 36-50. 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.014
  76. Robinson, A.C., 2019, Representing the presence of absence in cartography, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(1), 286-300. 10.1080/24694452.2018.1473754
  77. Rose, G., 2016, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials 4th edition, London: SAGE.
  78. Rundle, A.G., Bader, M.D., Richards, C.A., Neckerman, K.M., and Teitler, J.O., 2011, Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(1), 94-100. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.03421146773PMC3031144
  79. Rzotkiewicz, A., Pearson, A.L., Dougherty, B.V., Shortridge, A., and Wilson, N., 2018, Systematic review of the use of Google Street View in health research: Major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research, Health & Place, 52, 240-246. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.00130015181
  80. Schön, D.A., 1995, Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27-34. 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
  81. Slater, T., 2017, Territorial stigmatization: Symbolic defamation and the contemporary metropolis, in Hannigan, J. and Richards, G. eds., The Sage handbook of new urban studies, London: SAGE, 111-125. 10.4135/9781412912655.n8
  82. Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., and Mahmoudi, D., 2016, Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 990-1006. 10.1177/0263775816633195
  83. Tuan, Y.F., 1977, Space and place: The perspective of experience, Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press(구동희･심승희 역, 2015, ｢공간과 장소｣, 서울: 대윤).
  84. Van Dijck, J., 2014, Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology, Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197-208. 10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
  85. Wacquant, L., Slater, T. and Pereira, V.B., 2014, Territorial stigmatization in action, Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1270-1280. 10.1068/a4606ge
  86. Yin, L., Cheng, Q., Wang, Z., and Shao, Z., 2015, ‘Big data’ for pedestrian volume: Exploring the use of Google Street View images for pedestrian counts, Applied Geography, 63, 337-345. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.010
  87. 인천in, 2023년 6월 28일자, “아직 우물이 남아있고 옛 골목이 정겨운 곳, 호미마을”, http://www.incheonin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=96078 (2023년 10월 6일 접속).
  88. abcnews, 2019년 9월 29일자, “Google Street View has vast unmapped spaces. These volunteers are trying to fill in the blanks”, https://abcnews.go.com/International/google-street-view-vast-unmapped-spaces-volunteers-fill/story?id=65799291 (2023년 10월 6일 접속).
  89. Beneke, S., 2008, Field Trips and Fieldwork, https://illinoisearlylearning.org/blogs/perspectives/fieldtrips-fieldwork (2023년 8월 7일 접속).
  90. Cohen, J.E., 2007, Cyberspace as/and Space, Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works, https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1822&context=facpub (2023년 10월 6일 접속)
  91. Du, R. and Varshney, A., 2016, Social street view: blending immersive street views with geo-tagged social media, Web3D, https://www.cs.umd.edu/~varshney/papers/Du_SocialStreetView-BlendingImmersiveStreetViewsWithGeoTaggedSocialMedia_SIGGRAPH_Web3D_2016_lowres.pdf (2023년 10월 6일 접속).
  92. Olanoff, D., 2013, Inside Google Street View: From larry Page’s Car To The Depths Of The Grand Canyon, techcrunch, https://techcrunch.com/2013/03/08/inside-google-street-view-from-larry-pages-car-to-the-depths-of-the-grand-canyon/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFPvk_Zb9fiXAS4rGGtgwPu7hA4m0UxVNxl-DHpc-7-kI2bf7FIsoo_v0ycx0NmmYYatWAykgPP61WYobbrxwWY7Q3bkxbZZVtGjLfOvXTeEwemhp_JpVU9saA4_sLjJZnhq75Ztfvgqg1sxMs94DONYE_EB6qGls6JKB1J9gZY8 (2023년 10월 6일 접속).
  93. Saloheimo, T., Kaos, M., Fricker, P., and Hämäläinen, P., 2021, Automatic Recognition of Playful Physical Activity Opportunities of the Urban Environment, https://acris.aalto.fi/ws/portalfiles/portal/63809241/Parkour_Mindtrek2021_Final.pdf (2023년 10월 6일 접속).
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 12
  • No :4
  • Pages :509~531
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.12.4.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close