All Issue

2026 Vol.15, Issue 1 Preview Page

Research Article

31 March 2026. pp. 19~35
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a geography service-learning project based on the production and use of public-interest geographic information (a welfare map for older adults) on students’ social empathy. The project was designed as a civic-oriented learning activity in which students examined older adults’ lives at the intersection of individual circumstances and broader social and structural conditions while collaboratively producing and sharing a welfare map for older adults. The study adopted a mixed-methods design combining pre- and post-tests with qualitative data analysis. The results indicated that the experimental group showed a statistically significant increase in social empathy compared with the control group. The increase was greater in the social domain than in the personal domain, suggesting that students came to interpret the difficulties experienced by older adults not only as individual problems but also as issues related to structural conditions such as limited accessibility to welfare information and weaknesses in welfare information delivery systems. Furthermore, the experience of producing and disseminating public-interest geographic information encouraged students to extend their empathy toward civic responsibility and action. These findings suggest that service-learning grounded in public-interest geographic information can provide a meaningful pedagogical approach for fostering social empathy within geography education.
본 연구의 목적은 공익적 지리정보(노인 복지맵) 제작·활용에 기반한 지리교육적 봉사 학습 프로젝트를 설계·운영하고, 해당 프로젝트가 학생들의 사회적 공감 함양에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 것이다. 봉사 프로젝트는 노인의 삶을 개인 차원과 사회 구조적 차원의 교차점에서 이해·해석하고, 연구자와 학생들이 협업적으로 노인 복지맵을 생산·공유하는 시민적 실천을 중심으로 구성하였다. 연구는 학생들을 대상으로 사전·사후검사와 질적 자료 분석을 결합한 혼합 연구 방법으로 수행하였다. 분석 결과, 실험집단은 통제집단보다 사회적 공감 점수가 유의하게 향상되었고, 특히 사회적 영역이 개인적 영역보다 더 높은 점수 향상을 보였다. 이는 학생들이 노인의 어려움을 복지 정보 접근성과 전달 체계의 한계 등 사회 구조적 차원에서 비판적으로 분석하고, 공익적 지리정보를 생산·공유하는 실천을 통해 시민적 책임 의식과 행동으로 공감을 확장하였음을 시사한다. 본 연구는 공익적 지리정보 기반 봉사 학습이 사회적 공감 교육의 지리교육적 실천 가능성을 확장할 수 있음을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.
References
  1. 강유진·강효진, 2005, “노인복지서비스 인지도 및 이용의사에 영향을 미치는 요인,” 노인복지연구, 28, 255-294.
  2. 강은나·김혜수·정찬우·김세진·이선희·주보혜·황남희·김경래·이혜정·최경덕, 2023, 「2023년도 노인실태조사(연구 보고서 2023-84)」, 세종시: 한국보건사회연구원.
  3. 김민성·이창호, 2015, “지리공간기술 기반 봉사학습 프로젝트: 지오투어리즘 관점에서의 지역사회 참여,” 한국지도학회지, 15(3), 63-77. 10.16879/jkca.2015.15.3.063
  4. 김신영, 2006, “노인복지서비스 인지도 결정요인연구,” 노인복지연구, 32, 99-117. 10.1162/octo.2006.117.1.99
  5. 김안나, 2007, “한국의 사회적 배제 실태에 관한 실증적 연구,” 사회이론, 32, 227-256.
  6. 박가나, 2020, “사회과 교육과정 속 공감 관련 내용 분석,” 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(3), 787-813.
  7. 박성희, 2004, 「공감학: 어제와 오늘」, 서울: 학지사.
  8. 서영진, 2021, “사회적 공감 능력 신장을 위한 대학 교양 수업 사례와 효과 분석,” 교양교육실천연구, 5(1), 25-46.
  9. 손민석, 2025, “「통합사회」에서의 공간 정의 수업과 교육적 효과 –지역사회 공간 정의 프로젝트를 중심으로-,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 33(3), 35-53.
  10. 손민석·이진희, 2024, “공간적 시민성 교육에 대한 교사·학습자 요구 분석 -교수·학습모형 개발을 위한 현장 조사 및 교육적 방향성 설정-,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 32(3), 99-118.
  11. 신경일, 1994, “공감의 인지적, 정서적 요소 및 표현적 요소간의 관계,” 부산대학교 학생생활연구소, 29(1), 1-37.
  12. 이종임·박진우·이선민, 2021, “청년 세대의 분노와 혐오 표현의 탄생: 온라인 커뮤니티 <에브리타임>의 ‘혐오-언어’ 표현 실태분석을 중심으로,” 방송과 커뮤니케이션, 22(2), 5-37.
  13. 이종형, 2008, “공감이론의 도덕교육적 함의에 관한 연구: 마틴 호프만(Martin Hoffman)을 중심으로,” 경상대학교 박사학위논문.
  14. 전보애, 2010, “지리적 탐구방법과 통합된 봉사학습: 지역사회중심 환경교육의 실행사례 분석을 중심으로,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 18(3), 323-337. 10.17279/jkagee.2010.18.3.323
  15. 최용규·이서영, 2015, “사회과교육에서의 공감능력 향상을 위한 수업방안,” 사회과학교육연구, 17, 31-52.
  16. 한동균, 2018, “글로벌 정의교육을 위한 공감의 사회과 지리수업 모델 개발 및 적용 방안 모색,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 26(1), 37-58.
  17. 한동균, 2020, “사회적 공감 능력 신장을 위한 사회과교육 방안 모색,” 사회과교육, 59(2), 149-168. 10.37561/sse.2020.06.59.2.149
  18. 한동균, 2024, “중·고등학생용 사회적 공감 척도의 개발 및 타당화,” 사회과교육, 63(2), 141-164. 10.37561/sse.2024.6.63.2.141
  19. 한성범, 2023, “사회적 공감능력 함양을 위한 초등 사회과 수업의 구안 및 적용,” 사회과수업연구, 11(2), 97-115. 10.34261/jssls.2023.11.2.97
  20. 허순향·남승규, 2019, “공감의 구성요소와 심리적 기제,” 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어논문지, 9(3), 939-947.
  21. Adelman, M., Rosenberg, K.E., and Hobart, M., 2016, Simulations and social empathy: Domestic violence education in the new millennium, Violence Against Women, 22(12), 1451-462. 10.1177/1077801215625850
  22. Aramburuzabala, P. and Cerrillo, R., 2023, Service-learning as an approach to educating for sustainable development, Sustainability, 15(14), 11231. 10.3390/su151411231
  23. Barber, B., 1992, An Aristocracy of Everyone: The Politics of Education and the Future of America, New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
  24. Barrett-Lennard, G.T., 1981, The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(2), 91-100. 10.1037//0022-0167.28.2.91
  25. Beer, D.G., 2003, Sympathy and empathy: Women writers and a new idea, The Korean Association for Feminist Studies in English Literature, 11(2), 1-19.
  26. Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L., 2018, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed), Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  27. Davis, M.H., 1983, Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-26. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  28. De Vaus, D., 2002, Surveys in Social Research (5th ed), London: Routledge. 10.4135/9781446263495
  29. Decety, J. and Yoder, K.J., 2016, Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others, Social Neuroscience, 11(1), 1-14. 10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593 25768232 PMC4592359
  30. Deeley, S.J., 2010, Service-learning: Thinking outside the box, Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 4353. 10.1177/1469787409355870
  31. Dewey, J., 1990, School and Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Diemer, M.A. and Blustein, D.L., 2006, Critical consciousness and career development among urban youth, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 220-32. 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.001
  33. Eisenberg, N. and Miller, P.A., 1987, The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors, Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119. 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
  34. Farber, K., 2017, Real and Relevant: A Guide for Service and Project-Based Learning, Washington D.C.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  35. Ferrer-Juliá, M., Pereira, I., Cruz, J.A., and García-Meléndez, E., 2025, A service-learning project to acquire GIS skills and knowledge: A case study for environmental undergraduate students, Sustainability, 17, 2276. 10.3390/su17052276
  36. Freire, P., 1973, Education for Critical Consciousness, New York: Continuum.
  37. Grabbatin, B. and Fickey, A., 2012, Service-learning: Critical traditions and geographic pedagogy, Journal of Geography, 111(6), 254-60. 10.1080/00221341.2012.694465
  38. Guidi, C. and Traversa, C., 2021, Empathy in patient care: From ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic Concern’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 24, 573-85. 10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4 34196934 PMC8557158
  39. Hoffman, M.L., 1981, Is altruism part of human nature?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 121-37. 10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.121
  40. Hoffman, M.L., 2000, Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  41. Hylton, M.E., 2018, The role of civic literacy and social empathy on rates of civic engagement among university students, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(1), 87-106.
  42. Jacoby, B., 2015, Service-Learning Essentials: Questions, Answers, and Lessons Learned, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons(이현우·김효선·이원석·이정민·장덕호·장석진 역, 2018, 「서비스-러닝의 본질: 질문, 답, 그리고 깨달음」, 서울: 피와이메이트).
  43. Kindon, S., Pain, R., and Kesby, M., 2007, Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods, in Kindon, S., Pain, R., and Kesby, M., eds., Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place, New York: Routledge, 9-18. 10.4324/9780203933671
  44. Kraft, R.J., 1996, Service learning: An introduction to its theory, practice, and effects, Education and Urban Society, 28(2), 131-59. 10.1177/0013124596028002001
  45. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  46. Krznaric R., 2014, Empathy : A Handbook for Revolution, New York: Tarcher Perigee(김병화 역, 2018, 「진심으로 움직이게 하는 힘: 공감하는 능력」, 서울: 더퀘스트).
  47. Lefebvre, H., 1991, The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell(양영란 역, 2011, 「공간의 생산」, 서울: 에코리브르).
  48. MacEachren, A.M. and Kraak, M.J., 2001, Research challenges in geovisualization, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 28(1), 3-12. 10.1559/152304001782173970
  49. Morgan, J., 2000, Geography teaching for a sustainable society, in Kent, A., ed., Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 168-78. 10.4135/9781446220504.n14
  50. Nussbaum, M.C., 2010, Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  51. Rogers, C.R., 1980, A Way of Being, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  52. Sandel, M.J., 2020, The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?, London: Penguin UK.
  53. Schensul, J.J. and Berg, M., 2004, Youth participatory action research: A transformative approach to service-learning, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(3), 76-88.
  54. Segal, E.A., 2011, Social empathy: A model built on empathy contextual understanding and social responsibility that promotes social justice, Journal of Social Service Research, 37(3), 266-77. 10.1080/01488376.2011.564040
  55. Segal, E.A., 2018, Social Empathy: The Art of Understanding Others, New York: Columbia University Press(안종희 역, 2019, 「사회적 공감」, 서울: 생각이음). 10.7312/sega18480
  56. Segal, E.A. and Wagaman, M.A., 2017, Social empathy as a framework for teaching social justice, Journal of Social Work Education, 53(2), 201-11. 10.1080/10437797.2016.1266980
  57. Slater, F., 1992, To travel with a different view, in Naish, M., ed., Geography and Education, Institute of Education, London: University of London, 97-113.
  58. Soja, E.W., 2010, Seeking Spatial Justice, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001
  59. Stiglitz, J.E., 2012, The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  60. Wade, R. and Yarbrough, D., 2007, Service-learning in the social studies: Civic outcomes of the 3rd-12th grade civic connections program, Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(3), 366-92. 10.1080/00933104.2007.10473341
  61. Watts, R.J., Diemer, M.A., and Voight, A.M., 2011, Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 43-57. 10.1002/cd.310
  62. Wessell, J., 2024, The kellogg tree project: Using service learning and field research with geospatial technologies, Journal of Geography, 123(5), 141-46. 10.1080/00221341.2024.2413990
  63. Wilczenski, F.L. and Coomey, S.M., 2007, A Practical Guide to Service Learning: Strategies for Positive Development in Schools, New York, NY: Springer.
  64. Wispé, L., 1986, The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314-21. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314
  65. Yoo, C. and Jang, W., 2019, Social empathy for society beyond the social work profession: A contextual understanding of poverty and attitudes towards government interventions, Sociétés, 145(3), 25-36. 10.3917/soc.145.0025
  66. National Youth Leadership Council 홈페이지, 2025년 8월 5일자, “Service-Learning”, https://nylc.org/service-learning
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 15
  • No :1
  • Pages :19~35