All Issue

2022 Vol.11, Issue 3
Developing Artificial Intelligence-Based Geography Teaching and Learning Strategies Using Goal-Based Scenario

목표기반시나리오를 활용한 인공지능 기반 지리 교수학습 전략 개발

김민성

Minsung Kim

2022. pp. 271~286
PDF Citation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop artificial intelligence-based geography teaching and learning modules using goal-based scenario to realize the components of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Furthermore, it examined the validity and applicability of the developed modules. Considering the situations of the secondary classroom and students’ cognitive level, this study adopted online-based artificial intelligence platform. A coastal sand dune plant classification module using Teachable Machine, a geomorphology cartoon drawing module using the itself application, an urban image geo-ticon creation module using AutoDraw, and an urban landscape masterpiece painting module using Deep Dream Generator were developed. Geography teachers and graduate students majoring in geography education evaluated the validity and applicability of the modules positively. This study represents a preliminary attempt to develop concrete teaching and learning strategies using artificial intelligence in the context of geography education and to evaluate the validity and applicability empirically, expanding the scope of relevant research.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Technological pedagogical content knowledge
Goal-based scenario
Validity
Applicability
이 연구의 목적은 테크놀로지 교수내용지식의 구성 요소를 생산적으로 실체화하는 목표기반시나리오를 활용해 인공지능 기반 지리 교수학습 전략을 개발하고 그 타당성 및 적용가능성을 평가하는 것이다. 중고등 학교 현장의 상황과 학생들의 인지 수준을 고려하여 온라인 기반의 인공지능 플랫폼을 이용하여 학습모듈을 개발하였다. 개발된 모듈은 티처블 머신(Teachable Machine)을 활용한 해안사구 식물 분류 모델 생성하기, 잇셀프(itself)를 활용한 지형 설명 학습만화 그리기, 오토드로우(AutoDraw)를 활용한 도시 이미지 지리티콘 고안하기, 딥 드림 제너레이터(Deep Dream Generator)를 활용한 도시 경관 명화 만들기이다. 지리 교사 및 지리교육 전공 대학원생들은 개발된 모듈의 타당성 및 현장 적용가능성을 긍정적으로 평가하였다. 이 연구는 지리교육 맥락에서 인공지능을 활용한 구체적 학습전략을 개발하고, 그 타당성 및 적용가능성을 평가한 선도적 시도로 관련 연구의 지평을 확장하는 데 기여할 수 있을 것이다.
키워드
인공지능
테크놀로지 교수내용지식
목표기반시나리오
타당성
적용가능성
References
  1. 김민성, 2021, “4차 산업혁명 시대 인공지능의 교육적 활용과 지리교육의 과제,” 한국지리학회지, 10(3), 329-345.
  2. 김민성･김현미, 2021, “지리답사를 통한 심미적 감성 역량 함양,” 교사교육연구, 60(2), 213-226.
  3. 김민성･유수진, 2014, “지리공간기술을 이용하는 목표기반시나리오 학습모듈 개발,” 사회과교육, 53(1), 79-93.
  4. 김민성･유수진, 2016, “목표기반시나리오를 활용한 환경교육 교수･학습모듈의 개발과 적용,” 한국지역지리학회지, 22(2), 466-482.
  5. 김민성･이상일, 2022, “인공지능의 교육적 활용과 지리 교수학습 전략,” 정대홍･조영환･임철일･손미현･김민성･이상일･김선희･류나영･김기택･이병민･성민창･성상환･이옥선･박재범･이경화･유연주･조정효･문공주･박동열･모경환･강은희, ｢인공지능 시대, 교사가 만드는 미래학교｣, 서울: 교육과학사, 105-127.
  6. 김민성･이상일･이소영, 2016, “지리공간서비스의 교육적 함의와 교수학습 모델 개발,” SNU Journal of Education Research, 25(1), 1-26.
  7. 김진수･박남제, 2019, “초등과정 인공지능 학습원리 이해를 위한 보드게임 기반 게이미피케이션 교육 실증,” 정보교육학회논문지, 23(3), 229-235.
  8. 류미영･한선관, 2019, “딥러닝 개념을 위한 인공지능 교육 프로그램,” 정보교육학회논문지, 23(6), 583-590.
  9. 박수진, 2017, “Goal-based scenario를 활용한 간호시뮬레이션 수업설계 및 적용,” 한국간호교육학회지, 23(2), 224-235.
  10. 박수홍･이상범, 2009, “문제해결력 증진을 위한 goal-based scenario(CBS) 학습프로세스 탐색: 초등 사회과 중심으로,” 초등교육연구, 22(4), 379-403.
  11. 박은희･박수홍, 2019, “GBS를 활용한 대학생 학습멘토 양성 교육 프로그램 모형 개발,” 수산해양교육연구, 31(6), 1833-1850.
  12. 신진선･조미헌, 2021, “초등학생을 위한 활동중심 인공지능 융합 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용,” 정보교육학회논문지, 25(3), 437-448.
  13. 윤지영･온정덕, 2017, “외국의 사회과 교육과정 분석을 통한 역량기반 교육과정에서 기능의 의미와 설계 방식 고찰,” 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(13), 315-345.
  14. 이명순, 2007, “GBS(Goal-Based Scenario)에 의한 ‘생태와 환경’ 수업 사례,” 환경교육, 20(3), 31-44.
  15. 이주호･정제영･정영식, 2021, ｢AI 교육혁명｣, 서울: 시원북스.
  16. 전연홍･정현미, 2014, “면대면 환경의 목표기반시나리오(GBS) 수업설계 가이드라인 개발,” 교육정보미디어연구, 20(3), 373-397.
  17. 정영근･민용성･이주연, 2019, “2015 개정 교육과정의 핵심역량 이해에 관한 고찰,” 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(18), 211-237.
  18. 조일현･임규연･이현우, 2002, “GBS+ 설계 모델을 적용한 e-learning 코스웨어 개발 연구,” 기업교육연구, 4(2), 95-117.
  19. 황예진･정도성, 2018, “GBS(목적기반시나리오) 이론을 활용한 NCS 기반 이러닝 콘텐츠 개발에 대한 연구: 사이버대학 색채디자인 교육을 중심으로,” 산업디자인학연구, 12(4), 1-13.
  20. 현순안･허균, 2019a, “목표기반시나리오를 적용한 상호작용적 수해양 교육 컨텐츠 개발 사례 연구,” 수산해양교육연구, 31(1), 100-110.
  21. 현순안･허균, 2019b, “목표기반시나리오를 활용한 교수-학습 전략의 효과성 검증을 위한 메타 분석,” 수산해양교육연구, 31(3), 693-702.
  22. Angeli, C. and Valanides, N., 2013, Technology mapping: An approach for developing technological pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 199-221.
  23. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., and Christodoulou, A., 2016, Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge, in Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., and Mishra, P., eds., Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 11-32.
  24. Archambault, L., 2016, Exploring the use of qualitative methods to examine TPACK, in Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., and Mishra, P., eds., Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 65-86.
  25. Argles, T., 2017, Teaching practical science online using GIS: A cautionary tale of coping strategies, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 341-352.
  26. Benton-Borghi, B.H., 2013, A universally designed for learning (UDL) infused technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) practitioners’ model essential for teacher preparation in the 21st century, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 245-265.
  27. Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J., and Lanegran, D., 2014, Technology integration in K–12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model, Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223-237.
  28. Hintz, A., Dencik, L., and Wahl-Jorgensen, K., 2018, Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  29. Iverson, K. and Colky, D., 2004, Scenario-based E-learning design, Performance Improvement, 43(1), 16-22.
  30. Kilic, E. and Yildirim, Z., 2012, Cognitive load and goal based scenario centered 3D multimedia learning environment: Learners’ motivation, satisfaction and mental effort, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(3), 329-349.
  31. Koehler, M.J. and Mishra, P., 2009, What is technological pedagogical content knowledge, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  32. Lin, T.C., Tsai, C.C., Chai, C.S., and Lee, M.H., 2013, Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336.
  33. Marsh, M., Golledge, R., and Battersby, S.E., 2007, Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in G6-college students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(4), 696-712.
  34. Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J., 2006, Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge, Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  35. Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H.B., and Ayas, C., 2015, Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument, Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241-263.
  36. Sakulkueakulsuk, B., Witoon, S., Ngarmkajornwiwat, P., Pataranutaporn, P., Surareungchai, W., Pataranutaporn, P., and Subsoontorn, P., 2018, Kids making AI: Integrating machine learning, gamification, and social context in STEM education, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 1005-1010.
  37. Schank, R.C., Berman, T.R., and Macpherson, K.A., 1999, Learning by doing, in Reigeluth, C.M., ed., Introductional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. 2), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 161-181.
  38. Schank, R.C., Fano, A., Bell, B., and Jona, M., 1994, The design of goal-based scenarios, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305-345.
  39. Shulman, L.S., 1986, Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  40. Shulman, L.S., 1987, Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
  41. Smart, V., Finger, G., and Sim, C., 2016, Developing TPACK: Envisioning technological pedagogical reasoning, in Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., and Mishra, P., eds., Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 53-62.
  42. Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., and Valtonen, T., 2020, Learning machine learning with very young children: Who is teaching whom?, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 25, 100182.
  43. Vartiainen, H., Toivonen, T., Jormanainen, I., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., and Valtonen, T., 2021, Machine learning for middle schoolers: Learning through data-driven design, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 29, 100281.
  44. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Tondeur, J., and van Braak, J., 2016, Using theoretical perspectives in developing an understanding of TPACK, in Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., and Mishra, P., eds., Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 33-51.
  45. Yeh, Y.F., Hsu, Y.S., Wu, H.K., Hwang, F.K., and Lin, T.C., 2014, Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique, British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707-722.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 11
  • No :3
  • Pages :271~286
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.11.3.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close