All Issue

2021 Vol.10, Issue 1
The Meaning of Powerful Knowledge and Geography Learning Strategies

힘있는 지식의 의미와 지리학습전략

김민성
2021. pp. 1~17
PDF Citation
Abstract
Sorry, not available.
Click the PDF button.
References
  1. 권정화, 2015, ｢지리교육학 강의노트｣, 서울: 푸른길.
  2. 김민성, 2016, “로우테크 원격탐사 활동의 교육적 효과: 비판적 공간사고력을 중심으로,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 24(4), 115-130.
  3. 김성배, 2009, “배출권거래제와 지방자치단체의 대응,” 공법연구, 38(1-2), 175-205.
  4. 류재명, 2002, “학생의 일상생활경험과의 연계성을 높일 수 있는 지리수업방법 개발에 관한 연구,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 10(3), 1-16.
  5. 서경혜, 2020, “역량기반 교육과정의 딜레마,” 교육과정연구, 38(4), 5-31.
  6. 서찬기, 1974, “한국농업의 공간 model에 관한 연구: 집약도분포와 그 회귀분포,” 대한지리학회지, 9(1), 1-18.
  7. 소경희, 2017, ｢교육과정의 이해｣, 파주: 교육과학사.
  8. 신정엽･김감영, 2020, “지리학 관점에서 도시기원 이론의 비판적 고찰,” 한국지리학회지, 9(2), 341-357.
  9. 심승희･권정화, 2013, “영국의 2014 개정 지리교육과정의 특징과 그 시사점,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 21(3), 17-31.
  10. 양호환･이영효･김한종･정선영･송상헌, 2009, ｢역사교육의 이론｣, 서울: 책과함께.
  11. 이상욱, 2019, ｢과학은 이것을 상상력이라고 한다｣, 서울: 휴머니스트.
  12. 이상은･소경희, 2019, “미래지향적 교육과정 설계를 위한 OECD 역량교육의 틀 변화 동향 분석: ‘Education 2030’을 중심으로,” 교육과정연구, 37(1), 139-164.
  13. 이지숙･박혜경･정철, 2011, “초･중학생의 지구온난화와 기후변화에 대한 인식,” 과학교육연구지, 35(2), 274-282.
  14. 이지은･강현석, 2017, “Bruner의 전･후기 교육과정 이론의 관련성 및 그 시사점 탐구,” 교육과정연구, 35(1), 173-198.
  15. 이희연, 2011, ｢경제지리학(제3판)｣, 파주: 법문사.
  16. 조철기･권정화, 2005, “지리적 자아로서의 학습자와 지리탐구에 근거한 학습의 논리,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 13(3), 333-347.
  17. 채종오･박선경, 2016, “한국의 탄소배출권 거래제 시행 1년 후 현황과 개선방안: EU 배출권 거래제와 비교를 통하여,” 한국기후변화학회지, 7(1), 41-48.
  18. 최상훈･이영효･김한종･강선주, 2007, ｢역사교육의 내용과 방법｣, 서울: 책과함께.
  19. 한혜정･박은주, 2015, “‘이론적 지식’의 성격과 위상에 대한 재고찰: M. Young과 R. Pring의 논의를 중심으로,” 교육과정연구, 33(3), 25-49.
  20. Barnett, R., 2009, Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum, Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429-440.
  21. Beck, J., 2013, Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge, Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 177-193.
  22. Béneker, T. and Palings, H., 2017, Student teachers' ideas on (powerful) knowledge in geography education, Geography, 102(2), 79-85.
  23. Berchin, I.I., Valduga, I. B., Garcia, J., and de Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O., 2017, Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees, Geoforum, 84, 147-150.
  24. Bernstein, B., 2000, Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Bloom, B.S., 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, New York: David McKay.
  26. Boehm, R.G., Solem, M., and Zadrozny, J., 2018, The rise of powerful knowledge, The Social Studies, 109(2), 125-135.
  27. Bustin, R., Lambert, D., and Tani, S., 2020, The development of GeoCapabilities: Reflections, and the spread of an idea, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 201-205.
  28. Butt, G., 2017, Debating the place of knowledge within geography education: Reinstatement, reclamation or recovery, in Brooks, C., Butt, G., and Fargher, M., eds., The Power of Geographical Thinking, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 13-26.
  29. Catling, S. and Martin, F., 2011, Contesting powerful knowledge: The primary geography curriculum as an articulation between academic and children’s (ethno-) geographies, The Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 317-335.
  30. Cebesoy, Ü.B., 2019, Pre-service teachers’ opinions about a two-day climate change education workshop, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(3), 211-227.
  31. Chang, C.H. and Pascua, L., 2016, Singapore students' misconceptions of climate change, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(1), 84-96.
  32. Christodoulou, D., 2014, Seven Myths about Education, London: Routledge(김승호 역, 2018, ｢아무도 의심하지 않는 일곱 가지 교육 미신｣, 서울: 페이퍼로드).
  33. Counsell, C., 2011, Disciplinary knowledge for all, the secondary history curriculum and history teachers’ achievement, The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 201-225.
  34. Counsell, C., 2018, Taking curriculum seriously, Impact, 4, 6-9.
  35. Daston, L. and Galison, P., 2007, Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
  36. Donert, K., 2015, Innovative Pedagogies Series: GeoCapabilities, York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
  37. Fargher, M., 2018, WebGIS for geography education: Towards a GeoCapabilities approach, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3), 111.
  38. Firth, R., 2011, Debates about knowledge and the curriculum: Some implications for geography education, in Butt, G., ed., Geography, Education and the Future, New York: Continuum, 141-164.
  39. Firth, R., 2013, What constitutes knowledge in geography?, in Lambert, D. and Jones, M., eds., Debates in Geography Education, London: Routledge, 59-74.
  40. Firth, R., 2015, Constructing geographical knowledge, in Butt, G., ed., MasterClass in Geography Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning, London: Bloomsbury, 53-66.
  41. Gersmehl, P., 2005, Teaching Geography, New York: The Guildford Press.
  42. Greeno, J.G. and van de Sande, C., 2007, Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction, Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9-23.
  43. Hartmann, B., 2010, Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse, Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 22(2), 233-246.
  44. Healey, G. and Walshe, N., 2020, Real-world geographers and geography students using GIS: Relevance, everyday applications and the development of geographical knowledge, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(2), 178-196.
  45. Hennig, B.D., 2019, Remapping geography: Using cartograms to change our view of the world, Geography, 104(2), 71-80.
  46. Higde, E., Oztekin, C., and Sahin, E., 2017, Turkish pre-service science teachers' awareness, beliefs, values, and behaviours pertinent to climate change, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 253-263.
  47. Khanna, P., 2016, Connectography, New York: Random House(고영태 역, 2017, ｢커넥토그래피 혁명｣, 서울: 사회평론).
  48. Kim, M. and Bednarz, R., 2013, Development of critical spatial thinking through GIS learning, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 350-366.
  49. Krathwohl, D.R., 2002, A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview, Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
  50. Lambert, D., 2011, Reviewing the case for geography, and the ‘knowledge turn’ in the English national curriculum, The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243-264.
  51. Lambert, D., 2015, Geography, in Wyse, D., Hayward, L., and Pandya, J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, London: Sage, 391-407.
  52. Lambert, D.M., Graves, N., and Slater, F., 2016, Geography as powerful knowledge, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(3), 189-194.
  53. Lambert, D., Solem, M., and Tani, S., 2015, Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723-735.
  54. Leinhardt, G. and Ravi, A., 2008, Changing historical conceptions of history, in Vosniadou, S. ed., International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, New York: Routledge, 328-341.
  55. Maude, A., 2016, What might powerful geographical knowledge look like?, Geography, 101(2), 70-76.
  56. Maude, A., 2018, Geography and powerful knowledge: A contribution to the debate, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 179-190.
  57. Mitchell, D. and Lambert, D., 2015, Subject knowledge and teacher preparation in English secondary schools: The case of geography, Teacher Development, 19(3), 365-380.
  58. Monroe, M.C., Plate, R.R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., and Chaves, W.A., 2019, Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research, Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791-812.
  59. Moore, R., 2004, Education and Society: Issues and Explanations in the Sociology of Education, Cambridge: Polity.
  60. Morgan, J., 2014, ‘Neither existence nor future’: The social realist challenge to school geography, in Barrett, B. and Rata, E., eds., Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum: International Studies in Social Realism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 136-152.
  61. Muller, J. and Young, M., 2019, Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited, The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196-214.
  62. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., 1993, The Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  63. Parker, J., 2002, A new disciplinarity: Communities of knowledge, learning and practice, Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 373-386.
  64. Roberts, M., 2014, Powerful knowledge and geographical education, The Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 187-209.
  65. Roberts, M., 2017, Geographical education is powerful if..., Teaching Geography, 42(1), 6-9.
  66. Seow, T., Chang, J., and Irvine, K.N., 2019, Field-based inquiry as a signature pedagogy for geography in Singapore, Journal of Geography, 118(6), 227-237.
  67. Solem, M., Lambert, D., and Tani, S., 2013, Geocapabilities: Toward an international framework for researching the purposes and values of geography education, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 3(3), 214-229.
  68. Stoltman, J., Lidstone, J., and Kidman, G., 2015, Powerful knowledge in geography: IRGEE editors interview Professor David Lambert, London Institute of Education, October 2014, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 1-5.
  69. Strong, T., 2008, A review of Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s objectivity, The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 62-66.
  70. Tan, C., 2019, A signature pedagogy for initial teacher education in Singapore, The New Educator, 15(3), 226-245.
  71. Tjernström, E. and Tietenberg, T., 2008, Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies?, Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315-324.
  72. Uhlenwinkel, A., Béneker, T., Bladh, G., Tani, S., and Lambert, D., 2017, GeoCapabilities and curriculum leadership: Balancing the priorities of aim-based and knowledge-led curriculum thinking in schools, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 327-341.
  73. Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K., and Rusanen, J., 2019, Powerful knowledge and the significance of teaching geography for in-service upper secondary teachers: A case study from Northern Finland, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(2), 103-117.
  74. Vygotsky, L., 1962, Thought and Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  75. Walkington, H., Dyer, S., Solem, M., Haigh, M., and Waddington, S., 2018, A capabilities approach to higher education: Geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 7-24.
  76. Wheelahan, L., 2007, How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637-651.
  77. World Economic Forum, 2019, Chart of the day: These countries create most of the world’s CO2 emissions, retrieved from https://bit.ly/2L3rv9s
  78. Young, M., 2008, Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  79. Young, M., 2009, What are schools for?, in Daniels, H., Lauder, H., and Porter, J., eds., Knowledge, Values and Educational Policy, London: Routledge, 10-18.
  80. Young, M., 2010, The future of education in a knowledge society: The radical case for a subject-based curriculum, The Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education, 22(1), 21-32.
  81. Young, M., 2014, Powerful knowledge as a curriculum principle, in Young, M., Lambert, D., Roberts, C., and Roberts, M., eds., Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 65-88.
  82. Young, M. and Muller, J., 2010, Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge, European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11-27.
  83. Zenghelis, D., 2006, Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, London: HM Treasury.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 10
  • No :1
  • Pages :1~17
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.10.1.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close