All Issue

2025 Vol.14, Issue 4

Research Article

Developing Learning Modules Based on Border Practices to Foster Critical Global Citizenship

비판적 세계시민성 함양을 위한 경계실천 학습 모듈 개발

정다은1†

Daeun Jeong1†

1서울대학교 지리교육과 박사과정
1Ph.D. Student, Department of Geography Education, Seoul National University
31 December 2025. pp. 413~433
PDF Citation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop learning modules based on the concept of 'border practices' and to validate their effectiveness, thereby practically implementing the critical global citizenship education required in the era of globalization. This study first converted the core concepts of border practices (the mobility, fluidity, and multi-layeredness of borders, bordering, cosmopolitan borders, and borderwork) into educational strategies for fostering critical global citizenship and derived a structured learning framework. Based on this framework, the modules were designed by integrating each concept into the 5E Inquiry Model. The modules are structured to encourage learners to critically reflect on the power mechanisms of borders and cultivate political and ethical responsibility along with a practical willingness to act. Finally, Delphi survey was conducted on the developed modules to confirm their content validity and expert consensus. This research establishes a practical foundation for critical global citizenship education within the context of geography, thereby contributing to enhancing its connection with the national curriculum and educational field, aligning with recent academic shifts.
Keywords
Critical global citizenship
Critical global citizenship education
Border practices
Geography education
본 연구의 목적은 세계화 시대에 요구되는 비판적 세계시민교육을 실천적으로 구현하고자 ‘경계실천(border practices)’ 개념에 기반한 학습 모듈을 개발하고 타당성을 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위해 먼저 경계실천의 주요 개념(경계의 이동성·유동성·다층성, 경계짓기, 세계시민적 경계, 경계작업)을 비판적 세계시민성 함양을 위한 교육 전략으로 전환하고 학습 프레임워크를 도출하였다. 이를 바탕으로 각 개념을 5E 탐구 학습모형에 통합하여 학습 모듈을 설계하였으며, 모듈은 학습자가 경계의 권력적 작동 기제를 비판적으로 성찰하고 정치·윤리적 책임감과 실천 의지를 함양하도록 구성되었다. 마지막으로 개발된 모듈에 대한 델파이 조사를 실시하여 내용 타당도 및 전문가 합의도를 확인하였다. 본 연구는 지리교육의 맥락에서 비판적 세계시민교육의 실천적 기반을 마련하고, 최근의 학문적 전환을 반영하여 국가 교육과정 및 현장과의 연계성을 제고하였다는 점에서 의의를 지닌다.
키워드
비판적 세계시민성
비판적 세계시민교육
경계실천
지리교육
References
  1. 김갑철, 2016, “정의를 향한 글로벌 시민성 담론과 학교 지리,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 24(2), 17-31.10.17279/jkagee.2016.24.2.17
  2. 김갑철, 2017, “세계지리 교과서의 이주 다시 읽기: 정의로운 글로벌 시민성을 향하여,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 25(3), 123-138.
  3. 김갑철, 2022, “학교 지리교실에서 비판적 세계시민성과 해체적 페다고지,” 한국지역지리학회지, 28(1), 118-132.10.26863/JKARG.2022.2.28.1.118
  4. 김기남, 2020, “평화와 통일을 위한 한국지리 교육과정 구상-영토와 경계의 관계론적 인식을 중심으로,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 28(2), 73-87.
  5. 김민성, 2013, “비판적 세계시민성을 통한 지리 교과서 재구성 전략: 르완다를 사례로,” 사회과교육, 52(2), 59-72.
  6. 김민성, 2017, “공간적 시민성의 개념화와 적용: 장애인 시각에서 대구 근대화 골목 바라보기,” 한국지리학회지, 6(3), 339-354.10.25202/JAKG.6.3.3
  7. 김민성·이윤구, 2023, “2022 개정 세계시민과 지리 교육과정의 주요 내용,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 31(2), 1-14.
  8. 김예슬·최아수, 2025, “포토보이스를 활용한 비판적 세계시민성 교육의 교수학습 모델 개발,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 33(1), 35-53.
  9. 박배균·쉬진위·신진숙, 2021, “지방적 주체의 경계만들기: 대만과 한국의 미시적 경계작업을 사례로,” 공간과 사회, 77, 163-197.
  10. 박위준, 2023, “국경 너머의 보더: 오늘날 보더는 어디에 있고 무엇으로 이루어졌는가?,” 대한지리학회지, 58(6), 563-584.
  11. 범영우, 2025, “비판지정학을 활용한 지리 교수학습의 전환적 탐색: 세계시민과 지리를 중심으로,” 한국지리학회지, 14(3), 281-297.10.25202/JAKG.14.3.3
  12. 원요한·임은진, 2021, “‘비판적 경계 읽기’수업을 통한 세계시민교육 방안 연구,” 한국지리학회지, 10(1), 51-65.10.25202/JAKG.10.1.4
  13. 윤노아, 2022, “사회과 수업에 나타난 세계시민성에 대한 비판적 분석,” 사회과교육, 61(1), 47-65.10.37561/sse.2022.03.61.1.47
  14. 윤성혜·강명희, 2017, “델파이 기법을 통한 대학생용 세계시민성 (Global Citizenship) 측정도구 개발,” 시민교육연구, 49(4), 63-87.10.35557/trce.49.4.201712.004
  15. 이경한, 2018, “세계시민교육의 관점에서 세계지리와 여행지리 교육과정의 비판적 분석,” 국제이해교육연구, 13(2), 39-75.10.35179/jeiu.2018.13.2.39
  16. 조철기, 2012, “비판교육학의 공간적 관심과 지리교육의 재개념화,” 대한지리학회지, 47(5), 775-790.
  17. 한희경, 2011, “비판적 세계 시민성 함양을 위한 세계지리 내용의 재구성 방안-사고의 매개로서,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 19(2), 123-141.
  18. Abdelmohsen, M. M., 2020, The development and validation of a module on enhancing students' critical thinking, collaboration and writing skills, SAR Journal-Science and Research, 3(4), 166-177.10.18421/SAR34-04
  19. Andersen, D. J., Klatt, M., and Sandberg, M., 2016, The Border Multiple: The Practicing of Borders between Public Policy and Everyday Life in a Re-scaling Europe, New York: Routledge.
  20. Andreotti, V., 2006, Soft versus critical global citizenship education, Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 3, 40-51.
  21. Blackmore, C., 2016, Towards a pedagogical framework for global citizenship education, International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 8(1).10.18546/IJDEGL.8.1.04
  22. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., and Landes, N., 2006, The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness, Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
  23. Connor, U., 2025, Border praxeology: Linking border studies to practice theories, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1-20.10.1080/08865655.2025.2504881
  24. Dalkey, N. C., 1969, An experimental study of group opinion, Futures, 1(5), 408-426.10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
  25. de Vries, M., 2020, Enacting critical citizenship: An intersectional approach to global citizenship education, Societies, 10(4), 91.10.3390/soc10040091
  26. Delbecq, A. L., Vande Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D. H., 1975, Group Techniques for Program Planning, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Co.
  27. Dispa, J., Vloeberghs, W., and Skenderija, K., 2025, Getting critical about critical world citizenship: Bottom-up skills development and in-classroom operationalization within a dutch liberal arts college, Teaching in Higher Education, 1-21.10.1080/13562517.2025.2518406
  28. González-Valencia, G., Massip Sabater, M., and Santisteban Fernández, A., 2022, Critical global citizenship education: A study on secondary school students, Frontiers in Education, 7, 867113.10.3389/feduc.2022.867113
  29. Hafeda, M., 2016, Bordering practices: Negotiating theory and practice, Architecture and Culture, 4(3), 397-409.10.1080/20507828.2016.1251215
  30. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., and McKenna, H., 2000, Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
  31. Hsu, C.-C. and Sandford, B. A., 2007, The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(1), Article 10.
  32. Kim, H. and Yoo, S. S., 2022, Global citizenship education for critical consciousness: Emancipatory potentials and entrenched realities in South Korea, The Palgrave Handbook on Critical Theories of Education, 147-161.10.1007/978-3-030-86343-2_9
  33. Lawshe, C. H., 1975, A quantitative approach to content validity, Personnel Psychology, 28(4).10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  34. Mansouri, F., Johns, A., and Marotta, V., 2017, Critical global citizenship: Contextualising citizenship and globalisation, Citizenship and Globalisation Research Papers, 1(1), 1-9.10.1515/jcgs-2017-0001
  35. Newman, D. and Paasi, A., 1998, Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography, Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207.10.1191/030913298666039113
  36. Oxley, L. and Morris, P., 2013, Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions, British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301-325.10.1080/00071005.2013.798393
  37. Pashby, K., 2015, Conflations, possibilities, and foreclosures: Global citizenship education in a multicultural context, Curriculum Inquiry, 45(4), 345-366.10.1080/03626784.2015.1064304
  38. Pashby, K. and Costa, M. da, 2021, Interfaces of critical global citizenship education in research about secondary schools in ‘global north’ contexts, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(4), 379-392.10.1080/14767724.2021.1904213
  39. Pashby, K., Da Costa, M., Stein, S., and Andreotti, V., 2020, A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education, Comparative Education, 56(2), 144-164.10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352
  40. Popescu, G., 2011, Bordering and Ordering the Twenty-first Century: Understanding Borders, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (이용균·이현욱·이영민 역, 2018, ｢국가·경계·질서: 21세기 경계의 비판적 이해｣, 서울: 푸른길).10.5040/9798216383826
  41. Rumford, C., 2007, Does europe have cosmopolitan borders?, Globalizations, 4(3), 327-339.10.1080/14747730701532419
  42. Rumford, C., 2013, Towards a vernacularized border studies: The case of citizen borderwork, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 169-180.10.1080/08865655.2013.854653
  43. Seidel, S. and Budke, A., 2019, “A border is a ban”-students' conceptual understanding and experiences of europe's borders and boundaries, Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 9(1), 82-101.10.33403/rigeo.573476
  44. Seidel, S., Bettinger, P., and Budke, A., 2019, Representations and concepts of borders in digital strategy games and their potential for political education in geography teaching, Education Sciences, 10(1), 10.10.3390/educsci10010010
  45. Shah, H. A. and Kalaian, S. A., 2009, Which is the best parametric statistical method for analyzing Delphi data?, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(1), 20.10.22237/jmasm/1241137140
  46. SOLIDAR Foundation, 2023, We All Belong: The Role of GCE in Supporting Democratic Participation and Addressing Current Global Challenges (Policy Paper).
  47. Stein, S., 2015, Mapping global citizenship, Journal of College and Character, 16(4), 242-252.10.1080/2194587X.2015.1091361
  48. UNESCO, 2015, Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives, Paris: OECD.
  49. van Houtum, H., 2005, The geopolitics of borders and boundaries, Geopolitics, 10(4), 672-679.10.1080/14650040500318522
  50. Weiss, G., 2020, The social-constructivist concept of space in a german geography education context: Status-quo and potential, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 10(4), 684-705.10.33403/rigeo.781489
  51. International Baccalaureate, 2019, International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Geography guide, https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/curriculum/individuals-and-societies/geography/.
  52. Oxfam, Education for Global Citizenship, https://www.oxfam.org.uk/education/who-we-are/global-citizenship-guides/.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 14
  • No :4
  • Pages :413~433
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.14.4.1
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close