All Issue

2020 Vol.9, Issue 2 Preview Page
Mapping the Supply of Local Forest Ecosystem Services: Based on Delphi and Land Use Scoring Method

전문가 델파이 및 토지이용점수화 접근법을 활용한 지역 산림생태계서비스 공급량 지도화 연구

조장환, 최문기, 김오석, 이경학, 이창배
2020. pp. 295~312
PDF Citation
Abstract
Sorry, not available.
Click the PDF button.
References
  1. 강영호･윤석준･강길원･김창엽･유근영･신영수, 1998, “델파이기법을 적용한 암연구수준의 평가,” 예방의학회지, 31(4), 844-856.
  2. 공민재･이병모･김남춘･손진관, 2014, “논습지의 생태계서비스 가치평가를 위한 기능 및 요인분석,” 한국습지학회지, 16(2), 251-259.
  3. 김근한･이길상･김오석･최희선, 2019, “용도지역과 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용한 도시지역 확장 예측 연구,” 한국지리학회지, 8(3), 517-527.
  4. 김성훈･장동호･유재진, 2016, “생태계서비스의 조절서비스 중 침식조절에 대한 가치평가 연구: 서천군을 대상으로,” 한국사진지리학회지, 26(1), 15-34.
  5. 김예화･정승규･정슬기･이동근, 2015, “산림 생태계 서비스를 고려한 산림 보전가치 평가: 가평군을 대상으로,” 환경영향평가, 24(5), 420-431.
  6. 김유훈･최재용･윤정호･김오석･김근한, 2018, “정밀 임상도를 이용한 1:5,000 국토환경성평가지도 구축 가능성 검토,” 한국지리학회지, 7(1), 115-128.
  7. 김은영･김지연･정혜진･송원경, 2017, “도시공원의 생태계서비스 평가지표 개발 및 측정가능성 검토,” 환경영향평가, 26(4), 227-241.
  8. 김일권･김성훈･이재혁･권혁수, 2018, “지역 환경분야 이해당사자 인식을 반영한 생태계서비스 우수지역 분석: 안산시를 대상으로,” 환경영향평가, 27(5), 417-430.
  9. 김일권･김성훈･이주은･권혁수, 2019, “생태계서비스 번들을 이용한 경기도 도시의 유형화,” 환경영향평가, 28(3), 201-214.
  10. 김지수･한승현･장한나･김태연･장인영･오우석･서창완･이우균･손요환, 2016, “탄소 저장량을 이용한 국내 주요 생태계 기후 조절 서비스 지표 산정,” 한국환경생물학회지, 34(1), 8-17.
  11. 노영희･김충기･홍현정, 2016, “제주 생태계 조절서비스의 시계열적 변화: 탄소고정량 추정 및 경제성 평가를 중심으로,” 환경정책, 24(2), 29-44.
  12. 박미정･장도담･전정배･최진아･임창수･김은자, 2017, “농촌경관 생태계서비스 가치를 고려한 관리지표 개발,” 농촌계획, 23(4), 127-141.
  13. 박미정･전정배･최진아･김은자･임창수, 2016, “토지피복 지도를 이용한 생태계 서비스 가치 변화 분석,” 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 27(S), 681-688.
  14. 박철웅, 2020, “‘경관’, ‘장소’, ‘이미지’로서의 무등산 읽기,” 한국지리학회지, 9(1), 67-89.
  15. 사공정희･정옥식･여형범, 2015, “충청남도 논습지의 생태계서비스 가치 평가,” 농촌계획, 21(3), 1-17.
  16. 산림청, 2019, ｢2019년 임업통계연보 (제49호)｣, 대전: 산림청.
  17. 송철호･이우균･최현아･전성우･김재욱･김준순･김정택, 2015, “산림의 수자원 공급 생태계서비스 평가를 위한 InVEST Water Yield 모형의 적용,” 한국지리정보학회지, 18(1), 120-134.
  18. 신유진･박수진･박찬열, 2016, “선택 실험법을 이용한 문화 생태계서비스의 가치 평가,” 한국산림휴양학회지, 20(2), 65-77.
  19. 오우석･이창석, 2014, “훼손된 생태계의 복원을 통한 생태계 서비스의 회복: 채탄쓰레기 매립지 복원지의 사례,” 한국환경생물학회지, 32(2), 102-111.
  20. 오충현･김동효･오창길･이윤환･박은하, 2016, “충남 덕산도립공원 생태계서비스 지불제 도입 방안,” 문학과환경, 15(2), 97-124.
  21. 원호연･이영상･문형태, 2015, “월악산 신갈나무림의 유기탄소 분포와 순환을 통한 생태계서비스 가치평가,” 한국습지학회지, 17(4), 332-338.
  22. 이종성, 2001, ｢연구방법 21: 델파이 방법｣, 서울: 교육과학사.
  23. 전성우･김재욱･김유훈･정휘철･이우균･김준순, 2015, “생태계 서비스 기능평가를 위한 중분류 토지피복지도 산림지역 경계설정 개선 방안,” 한국환경복원기술학회지, 18(1), 127-133.
  24. 전성우･김재욱･정휘철, 2013, “생태계 서비스 가치평가를 위한 산림 유형 분류 방안: 임상도와 토지피복도 활용을 중심으로,” 한국환경복원기술학회지, 16(3), 31-39.
  25. 전성우･김재욱･정휘철･이우균･김준순, 2014, “생태계 서비스 가치평가를 위한 멸종위기 포유류의 종분포 연구: 전국자연환경조사 자료를 중심으로,” 한국환경복원기술학회지, 17(1), 111-1226.
  26. 정필모･서종철, 2014, “서천 일대의 생태자산 재구성을 통한 생태계서비스 제공,” 한국지역지리학회지, 20(2), 189-205.
  27. 조효선･이석모, 2016, “산림생태계의 구성요소와 서비스의 정량화 연구,” 수산해양교육연구, 28(2), 391-400.
  28. 한국환경정책･평가연구원 편, 2017, ｢산림 생태계서비스 기능별 평가기법 개발 및 가치평가｣, 세종: 한국환경정책･평가연구원.
  29. 한국환경정책･평가연구원 편, 2018, ｢산림생태계서비스 유형별 평가지표 고도화 및 평가기법 개발｣, 세종: 한국환경정책･평가연구원.
  30. Adler, M. and Ziglio, E., 1996, Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  31. Armstrong, J.S., 2002, Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners, International Journal of Forecasting, 18(3), 345-352
  32. Bagstad, K.J., Villa, F., Batker, D., Harrison-cox, J., Voigt, B., and Johnson, G.W., 2014, From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments, Ecology and Society, 19(2), 64 (http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06523-190264).
  33. Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A.B., Buchmann, N., He, J.S., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., and Schmid, B., 2006, Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services, Ecology Letters, 9(10), 1146-1156.
  34. Benedetti, Y., Morelli, F., Munafò, M., Assennato, F., Strollo, A., and Santolini, R., 2020, Spatial associations among avian diversity, regulating and provisioning ecosystem services in Italy, Ecological Indicators, 108, 105742 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105742).
  35. Birdir, K., and Pearson, T.E., 2000, Research chefs’ competencies: A Delphi approach, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(3), 205-209.
  36. Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S., 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616-626.
  37. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., and Müller, F., 2012, Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29.
  38. Castro, A.J., Verburg, P.H., Martín-López, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cabello, J., Vaughn, C.C., and López, E., 2014, Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis, Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 102-110.
  39. Chaudhary, S., McGregor, A., Houston, D., and Chettri, N., 2015, The evolution of ecosystem services: A time series and discourse-centered analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 25-34.
  40. Costanza, R., 2008, Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141(2), 350-352.
  41. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387(6630), 253-260.
  42. de Groot, R., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., and Willemen, L., 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260-272.
  43. de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Chermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L.C., Brink, P., and van Beukering, P., 2012, Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units, Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50-61.
  44. Diaz, M., Concepción, E.D., Oviedo, J.L., Caparrós, A., Farizo, B.Á., and Campos, P., 2020, A comprehensive index for threatened biodiversity valuation, Ecological Indicators, Ecological Indicators, 108, 105696 (https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105696).
  45. Dunford, R., Harrison, P., Smith, A., Dick, J., Barton, D.N., Martin-Lopez, B., Kelemen, E., Jacobs, S., Saarikoksi, H., Turkelboom, F., Verheyden, W., Antunes, P., Aszalos, R., Badea, O., Baro, F., Berry, P., Cavalho, L., Conte, G., Czucz, B., Blanco, G.G., Howard, D., Giuca, R., Baggethun, E., Grizzetti, B., Izakovicova, Z., Kopperoinen, L., Langmeyer, J., Lupque, S., Lapola, M. D., Pastur, G., Mukhopadhyay, R., Roy, S.B., Niemela, J., Norton, L., Ochieng, J., Odee, D., Palomo, I., Phnho, P., Priess, J., Rusch, G., Saarela, S., Santos, R., Wal, J., Vadineanu, A., Vari, A., Woods, H., and Pelkonen, V., 2018, Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations, Ecosystem Services, 29, 499-514.
  46. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., and Morling, P., 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653.
  47. Fisher, J.A. and Brown, K., 2014, Ecosystem services concepts and approaches in conservation, Ecological Economics, 108, 257-265.
  48. Gao, J., Yu, Z., Wang, L., and Vejre, H., 2019, Suitability of regional development based on ecosystem service benefits and losses: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China, Ecological Indicators, 107, 105579 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105579).
  49. Guan, Q., Hao, J., Ren, G., Li, M., Chen, A., Duan, W., and Chen, H., 2020, Ecological indexes for the analysis of the spatial–temporal characteristics of ecosystem service supply and demand: A case study of the major grain-producing regions in Quzhou, China, Ecological Indicators, 108, 105748 (https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105748).
  50. Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M., 2012, Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES, Version 4.1), European Environment Agency, 33, 107.
  51. Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., and Bieling, C., 2013, An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators, Ecological Indicators, 29, 434-444.
  52. Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Pataki, G., Martín-López, B., and Gómez-Baggethun, E., 2014, Non-monetary techniques for the valuation of ecosystem service (https://www.guidetoes.eu/synthesispapers/OpenNESS_SP6_Non-monetary_Valuation.pdf).
  53. Kezar, A. and Maxey, D., 2016, The Delphi technique: An untapped approach of participatory research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 143-160.
  54. Kopperoinen, L., Albert, C., and Itkonen, P., 2016, Applications of biodiversity and ecosystem services impact assessment in spatial planning, in Geneletti, D., ed., Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Impact Assessment, Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment Series, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 222-254.
  55. Kull, C.A., de Sartre, X.A., and Castro-Larrañaga, M., 2015, The political ecology of ecosystem services, Geoforum, 61, 122-134.
  56. Kumar, P., 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, London: FSC.
  57. Lawshe, C.H., 1975, A quantitative approach to content validity, Personnel Psycholigy, 28(4), 563-575.
  58. Locatelli B., 2016, Ecosystem services and climate change, in Potschin, M., Haines‐Young, R., Fish, R., and Turner, R.K., eds., Handbook of Ecosystem Services, New York: Routledge, 481-490.
  59. Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J.P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E.G., Notte, A.L., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., Luisa Parac￾chini, M., Braat, L., and Bidoglio, G., 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union, Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 31-39.
  60. Maseyk, F.J., Mackay, A.D., Possingham, H.P., Dominati, E.J., and Buckley, Y.M., 2017, Managing natural capital stocks for the provision of ecosystem services, Conservation Letters, 10(2), 211-220.
  61. Portalanza, D., Barral, M.P., Villa-Cox, G., Ferreira-Estafanous, S., Herrera, P., Durigon, A., and Ferraz, S., 2019, Mapping ecosystem services in a rural landscape dominated by cacao crop: A case study for Los Rios province, Ecuador, Ecological Indicators, 107, 105593 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105593).
  62. Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., and Onaindia, M., 2015, Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach, Ecosystem Services, 13, 108-118.
  63. Quine, C.P., Bailey, S.A., and Watts, K., 2013, Sustainable forest management in a time of ecosystem services frameworks: common ground and consequences: The UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 863-867.
  64. Raum, S., 2018, Reasons for adoption and advocacy of the ecosystem services concept in UK forestry, Ecological Economics, 143, 47-54.
  65. Reid, W.V., Mooney, H.A., Cropper, A., Vapistrano, D., Carpenter, S.R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Hassan, R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R.M., McMichael, A.J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R.T., Zakri, A.H., and Shidong, Z., 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being-Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington D.C.: Island Press.
  66. Rowe, G. and Wright, G., 1999, The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis, International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375.
  67. Sallustio, L., De Toni, A., Strollo, A., Di Febbraro, M., Gissi, E., Casella, L., Geneletti, D., Munafò, M., Vizzarri, M., and Marchetti, M., 2017, Assessing habitat quality in relation to the spatial distribution of protected areas in Italy, Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 129-137.
  68. Schägner, J.P., Brander, L., Maes, J., and Hartje, V., 2013, Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects, Ecosystem Services, 4, 33-46.
  69. Sharps, K., Masante, D., Thomas, A., Jackson, B., Redhead, J., May, L., Prosser, H., Cosby, B., Emmett, B., and Jones, L., 2017, Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment, Science of the Total Environment, 584, 118-130.
  70. Smith, A.C., Harrison, P.A., Soba, M.P., Archaux, F., Blicharska, M., Egoh, B.N., Eros, R., Domenech, N., Gyorgy, A.I., Haines-Young, R., Li, S., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Miguel Ayala, L., Mononen, L., Simpson, G., Stange, E., Turkelboom, F., Uiterwijk, M., Veerkamp, C.J., and Echeverria, V., 2017, How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review, Ecosystem Services, 26, 111-126.
  71. Syrbe, R.-U. and Walz, U., 2012. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem ser￾vices: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics, Ecological Indicators, 21, 80-88.
  72. Vrebos, D., Staes, J., Vandenbroucke, T., Johnston, R., Muhumuza, M., Kasabeke, C., and Meire, P., 2015, Mapping ecosystem service flows with land cover scoring maps for data-scarce regions, Ecosystem Services, 13, 28-40.
  73. Wei, H., Fan, W., Wang, X., Lu, N., Dong, X., Zhao, Y., Ya, X., and Zhao, Y., 2017, Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review, Ecosystem Services, 25, 15-27.
  74. Wen, X., Deng, X., and Zhang, F., 2019, Scale effects of vegetation restoration on soil and water conservation in a semi-arid region in China: Resources conservation and sustainable management, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104474 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104474).
  75. Wolff, S., Schulp, C.J.E., and Verburg, P.H., 2015, Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives, Ecological Indicators, 55, 159-171.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 9
  • No :2
  • Pages :295~312
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.9.2.5
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close