All Issue

2023 Vol.12, Issue 4 Preview Page

Research Article

31 December 2023. pp. 547~575
Abstract
In terms of ‘knowledge turn’ and debates in knowledge, this study tried to trace changing aspects and major issues and its theoretical background in National Curriculum in England since 2010s when debates in knowledge began. After examining Hirsch’s concept of cultural competency and core knowledge, and Labor Party’s cultural turn and integrated competency based curriculum, Social realism and critical realism as its theoretical base of ontology, epistemology and methodology was examined as alternative. Two pillar of powerful knowledge and future education scenario frame work was extracted to suggest desirable alternative. In the analysis of future of education, future 1 would bring the extinction of knowledge by dividing knowledge boundaries into too small sections with much emphasis on teacher centered education, and future 2 also would bring the extinction of knowledge by too much emphasis on student centered education. To overcome instrumental viewpoint of future 1 and future 2 model, future 3 was suggested to produce powerful knowledge and to cross over boundaries of knowledge for creating new knowledge based on social realism.
이 연구는 ‘지식 전회’와 지식논쟁의 측면에서, 영국의 국가교육과정의 주요 쟁점과 이론적 논의를 지리 교과를 중심으로 파악하고자 하였다. Hirsch의 문화적 문화력과 핵심지식 중심의 주장과 노동당 정부의 문화적 전회와 역량중심, 통합중심으로의 교육과정 개편과 관련된 쟁점들을 살펴보고, 사회적 실재론과 그 토대인 비판적 실재론의 존재론, 인식론, 방법론의 근거들을 검토하여, 사회적 실재론에 근거한 교육과정 구성의 핵심적 내용인 Young의 ‘강력한 지식’과 Young and Muller의 ‘교육의 미래’ 논의를 바탕으로 지리교육의 방향을 모색하였다. 무엇을 할 수 있는 지 또는 그것에 접근하는 사람들에게 어떤 지적 능력을 주는 지와 관련되는 강력한 지식은, 보다 신뢰할 수 있는 설명, 세계에 대한 새로운 사고와 그것을 획득하는 방식, 그리고 정치적, 도덕적 그리고 여러 종류의 논쟁들에 참여하는데 필요한 언어를 학습자에게 제공할 수 있다. 교육의 미래에 대한 분석에서 미래 1이 지나치게 지식의 경계에 집착하고 교사중심적이라면, 미래 2는 지나치게 학생중심적이고 경계를 무너뜨려서 지식이 소멸되는 등 상반되는 극단적 결과를 가져오므로, 사회적 실재론에 바탕한 강력한 지식이 획득되는 조건들을 확보하여 새로운 지식의 창안과 획득을 위한 ‘경계가로지르기’를 할 수 있는 미래 3이 강력한 대안이 될 수 있다.
References
  1. 김민성, 2021, “힘있는 지식의 의미와 지리학습전략,” 한국지리학회지, 10(1), 1-17. 10.25202/JAKG.10.1.1
  2. 서태열, 1993, 「지리교육과정의 내용구성에 관한 연구」, 서울대 박사학위논문.
  3. 서태열, 2005, 「지리교육학의 이해」, 서울: 한울아카데미.
  4. 심승희・권정화, 2013, “영국의 2014 개정 지리교육과정의 특징과 그 시사점,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 21(3), 17-31.
  5. 윤여탁, 2015, “한국에서의 문식성 교육의 반성과 전망”, 국어교육연구, 36, 535-561.
  6. 이기홍, 2021, “비판적 실재론이 상기시키는 사회과학의 가능성,” 담론201, 24(12), 73-121.
  7. 이상일, 1990, “실재론의 지리학적 함의와 공간의 상대적 자율성에 관한 연구”, 지리교육논집, 24, 1-24.
  8. 이성회, 2018, “대안적 교육정책평가 모델로서 실재론적 평가,” 교육사회학연구, 28(3), 97-127. 10.32465/ksocio.2018.28.3.004
  9. 이성회, 2021, “사회적 실재론(social realism)의 지식관이 역량기반 교육과정 정책에 주는 시사점,” 한국교육, 48(1), 137-166.
  10. 이성회, 2022, “비판적 실재론의 역행추론을 적용한 교육학 연구 설계의 실제,” 교육학연구, 60(8), 281-312.
  11. 장영진, 2003, “영국의 국가교육과정 제정과 그 영향,” 대한지리학회지, 38(4), 640-656.
  12. 정영근・김영춘・김현미・민병수・손민정・신동광・옥현진・이근님・이근호・이병천・이용백・이혜원・장호성・조보경, 2011, 「2011, 교육과정・교육평가 국제동향 연구사업-독일・러시아・영국・프랑스・핀란드-」, 연구자료 ORM 2011-77-4, KICE.
  13. 정영근・임찬빈・김영준・김영춘・민병수・이근님・이혜원・김천홍・민전순・이부련・조성복・최진석, 2009, 「2009 교육과정・교육평가 국제동향 연구-독일・러시아・영국・프랑스・핀란드-」, 연구보고 RRO 2009-9-4, KICE.
  14. 정영근・진경애・김영준・김영춘・민병수・손민정・신동광・윤영순・이근님・이근호・이병천・이용백・이혜원・장호성・전효선・조보경, 2010, 「2010 교육과정・교육평가 국제동향 연구사업-영국」, 연구자료 ORM 2010-61-8, KICE.
  15. 조철기, 2006, “영국 국가교육과정에서 시민성 교과의 출현과 지리교육의 동향, 한국지역지리학회지,” 12(3). 1-12.
  16. 조철기, 2012a, “영국 국가교육과정의 개정과 새로운 지리 학습프로그램의 특징,” 한국지역지리학회지, 18(2). 232-251.
  17. 조철기, 2012b, “영국의 국가교육과정 정치학과 지리교육 진흥운동,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 20(3), 63-82.
  18. 조철기, 2014, “영국 국가지리교육과정 개정과 지식논쟁,” 대한지리학회지, 49(3), 456-471.
  19. 조철기, 권정화, 2006, “영국 지리교육계의 포스트모더니즘 도입 논쟁과 그 함의,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 14(1), 1-12.
  20. Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norris A.(eds.), 1998, Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London and New York: Routledge.
  21. Barnett, C., 1997, Sing along with the common people: politics, postcolonialism and other figures. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 137-154.
  22. Barnett, C., 1998, The Cultural turn: Fashion or progress in human geography, Antipode, 30(4), 379-394. 10.1111/1467-8330.00085
  23. Bernstein, B., 1996, pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, London: Taylor & Francis.
  24. Bernstein, B., 2000, pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, 2nd ed., Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  25. Bernstein, B., 2009, Class, codes and control, London and New York: Routledge.
  26. Bhaskar, 1975, Realist Theory of Science, London and New York: Routledge.
  27. Bhaskar, 1998, The Possibility of Naturalism, London and New York: Routledge.
  28. Birbalsingh, K., 2015, How knowledge leads to self-esteem, in Jonathan Simons and Natasha Porter eds., Knowledge and the Curriculum: A collection od essays to accompany E. D. Hirsch’s lecture at Policy Exchange, London: Policy Exchange, 36-42.
  29. Bonnett, A, 2008, What is Geography?, London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446213001
  30. Buckingham, D. and Jones, K., 2001, New Labour’s cultural turn: some tensions in contemporary educational and cultural policy, Journal of Educaional Policy, 16(1), 1-14. 10.1080/02680930010009796
  31. Castree, N., 1999, Situating cultural twists and turns’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 257-260.
  32. Christodoulou, D.(김승호 옮김), 2018, 일곱가지 교육미신, 서울: 페이퍼로드(Christodoulou, Daisy, 2014, Seven Myths about Education, London and New York: Routledge). 10.4324/9781315797397
  33. Collier, A., 1994, Critical Realism, London: Verso.
  34. Cosgrove, D. and Jackson, P. (1987) New directions in cultural geography. Area, 19:95-101.
  35. Danemark, B., Ekströn, M., and Karlsson, J.C., 2002, Explaining Society, Lon and New York, Routledge.
  36. Daniels, S. and Denis, C., 1993, “Spectacle and text: Landscape metaphors in cultural geography,” in James Duncan and David Ley, 1993, Place/Culture/Representation, Routledge, London and New York, 57-77.
  37. DES, 1990, Geography for ages 5 to 16, London: HMSO.
  38. DfE(Department for Education), 2010, The Importance of Teaching, London: HMSO.
  39. DfE(Department for Education), 2014, The National Curriculum in England, London: HMSO.
  40. Dowgill, P. and Lambert, D., 1992, Cultural literacy and school geography, Geography, 77(2), 143-151.
  41. Duplass, James A., 2020, The Essence of Teaching Social Studies- Methods for Secondary and Elementary Teacher Candidates, Routledge. 10.4324/9781003095682
  42. Film Education Working Group(FEWG), 1999, Making Movies Matter, London: British Film Institute.
  43. Firth, R., 2011, Debates about Knowledge and Curriculum: Some Implications for Geography Education, in G. Butt(ed.). Geography Education and Future, London: Continuum, 141-164.
  44. Firth, R., 2013, What constitutes knowledge in geography, in D. lambert and M. Johnes(eds.), Debates in Geography Education, London: Routledge, 59-74.
  45. GA(Geographical Association), 2011, The Geography National Curriculum: GA Curriculum Proposals and Rationale, Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  46. Gee, M. (1998) Arts education and the future, Education and Social Justice, 1(1), 29 - 31.
  47. Gibb, N., 2015, How E. D. Hirsch came to shape UK government policy, in Jonathan Simons and Natasha Porter eds., Knowledge and the Curriculum: A collection od essays to accompany E. D. Hirsch’s lecture at Policy Exchange, London: Policy Exchange, 12-20.
  48. Graff, H.J., 1989, Critical Literacy versus Cultural literacy- reading signs of the times?, Interchange, 20(1), 46-52. 10.1007/BF01808331
  49. Graham, T. (1999) Believe it or not - a tale about a unicorn: culture and education in England in the 1990s, Education and Social Justice, 2(1), 58-63.
  50. Hartwig, M., 2007, Holy Trinity, in Hartwig Mervyn, 2007, Dictionary of Critical Realism, New York: Routledge, 238-242.
  51. Hirsch, E.D., 1987, Cultural Literacy, Boston: Hutton Mifflin Co.
  52. Hirsch, E.D., 1996, A First Dictionary of Cultural Literacy- What Our Children Need to Know, Houghton Mifflin.
  53. Hirsch, E.D., 1996, The Schools We Need and Why We Don’t Have Them, New York: Doubleday. 10.2307/358685
  54. Hirsch, E.D., 1980, Culture and literacy. Journal of Basic Writing, 3(1), 27-47. 10.37514/JBW-J.1980.3.1.04
  55. Hoadley, U., Sehgal-Cuthbert, A., Barrett, B., and Morgan, J., (Alka Sehgal-Cuuthbert, Brian Barrtt and John Morgan), 2019. After the knowledge turn? Politics and pedagogy, The Curriculum Journal, 30(2). 99-104. 10.1080/09585176.2019.1601844
  56. Hodgson, J. and Harris, A., 2022, The Genealogy of ‘cultural literacy’, Change English, 29(4), 382-395. 10.1080/1358684X.2022.2081530
  57. Hopkin, J., 2013, Framing the geography national curriculum, Geography, 98(2), 60-67. 10.1080/00167487.2013.12094369
  58. Jackson, P., 1989. Maps of Meaning: An Introduction to Cultural Geography. London: Unwin Hyman.
  59. Jackson, P., 1997, Geography and the cultural turn, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 113(3), 186-188. 10.1080/00369229718737012
  60. Lambert, D., 1999. Exploring the use of textbooks in Key Stage 3 geography classrooms: A small-scale study. The Curriculum Journal, 10, 1, 85-105. 10.1080/0958517990100107
  61. Lambert, D., 2011, Reviewing the case for geography, and the ‘knowledge turn’ in the English National Curriculum, The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243-264. 10.1080/09585176.2011.574991
  62. Maalsen, S. and McLean, J., 2020, Cultural turn, in Audrey Kobayashi ed., Encyclopedia of human geography, 2nd ed. vol.3, 117-121, London: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10634-1
  63. Maine, F. and Cook, V., 2019, Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice, London Review of Education, 17(3), 383-392. 10.18546/LRE.17.3.12
  64. Massey, D., 2006, The geographical mind, In Balderstone, David ed., Secondary Geography Handbook. UK: Geographical Association, 46-51.
  65. Maton, K. and Moore, R., 2010, Introduction: Coalitions of Mind, in Maton and Moore(eds.), Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Edcuation, London & New York: Continuum, 1-13.
  66. Maude, A., 2016, What might powerful geographical knowledge look like?, Geography, 101(2), 70-76. 10.1080/00167487.2016.12093987
  67. McHugh, B. and Sam, S., 1999, Core Knowledge Curriculum Three-Year Analysis of Implementation and Effects in Five Schools, Report No. 40, Baltimolre: CRESPAR (the Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk).
  68. Moore, R., 2013, Social realism and the problem of the problem of knowledge in the sociology of education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3). 333-353. 10.1080/01425692.2012.714251
  69. Morgan, J., 2007, School geography and the politics of culture, Geography Compass, 1(3), 373-388. 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00024.x
  70. Morgan, J., Hordern, J., and Hoadley, U., 2019, On the politics and ambition of the ‘turn’: unpacking the relations between Future 1 and Future 3, The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 105-124. 10.1080/09585176.2019.1575254
  71. Muller, J. and Young, M., 2019, Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited, The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196-214. 10.1080/09585176.2019.1570292
  72. Muller, J., 2006, Differentiation and progression in the curriculum, in M. Young and J. Gamble(eds.), Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Future Education, Cape Town: HSRC press, 66-86.
  73. Muller, J., 2023, Powerful knowledge, disciplinary knowledge, Curriculum knowledge: Educational knowledge, International Research in Geography and Environmental Edution, 32(1), 20-34. 10.1080/10382046.2022.2058349
  74. National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cutural Education(NACCCE), 1999, All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education, London: DfEE/DCMS.
  75. O’shaughnessy, J., 2015, Knowledge and character, in Jonathan Simons and Natasha Porter eds., Knowledge and the Curriculum: A collection od essays to accompany E. D. Hirsch’s lecture at Policy Exchange, London: Policy Exchange, 29-35.
  76. Philo, C., 1991, New words, New worlds. London: Institute of British Geographers.
  77. Richard, H., 2001, Pedagogy and ‘cultural turn’ in geography, Guest editorial, Environment and Planning D, 19, 1-6. 10.1068/d1901ed
  78. Roberts, M., 1998, The impact and the legacy of the 1991 geography national curriculum at key stage 3, Geography, 83(1), 15-27.
  79. Roberts, N., 2021, The School Curriculum in England, Briefing Paper No.06798, House of Commons, Parliament, UK.
  80. Sayer, A., 1984, Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203310762
  81. Sayer, A., 1992, Method in Social Science- A Realist Approach, 2nd ed, London and Ne York: Routledge
  82. Sayer, A., 2000, Realism and Social Science, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  83. Simons, J. and Porter, N., eds., 2015, Knowledge and the Curriculum: A collection of essays to accompany E. D. Hirsch’s lecture.
  84. Soja, E.W., 1989, Postmodern Geographies, London and New York: Verso
  85. Tapsfield, A. and Lambert, D., 2011, Geography Curriculum Consultation Full Report, Sheffield: Geogaphical Association.
  86. Taylor, L., 2004, Re-Presenting Geography, Cambridge, Chris Kington Publishing.
  87. Waugh, D. and Bushell, T., 1991, Key Geography: Foundations, Wallingford: Nelson Thornes.
  88. Wheelahan, L., 2007, How Competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637-651. 10.1080/01425690701505540
  89. Wheelahan, L., 2010, Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum: A Social Realist Argument, London: Routledge.
  90. Wynn, D. and Williams, C. K., 2012, Principles fo conducting critical realist case study research in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787-810. 10.2307/41703481
  91. Yeung, H.W.C., 1997, Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method?, Progress in Human Geography, 21(1), 51-74. 10.1191/030913297668207944
  92. Young, M. 2008, Bringing Knowledge Back in, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203073667
  93. Young, M. and Muller. J., 2010, Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge, European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11-27. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01413.x
  94. Gove, Michael (MP), 2009, What Is Education For? speech to the RSA(Royal Society of Arts), 2009. 6. 30. https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/gove-speech-to-rsa.pdf
  95. Jones, A., 2021, 5,000 items that every American needs to know” https://mrjoneswhiteboard.blog/2021/07/26/e-d-hirschs-views-on-the-curriculum-popular-but-perpetually-problematic/
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 12
  • No :4
  • Pages :547~575