All Issue

2022 Vol.11, Issue 1 Preview Page
The Effect of Cultural Schema Reference on Landscape Cognition of Elementary School Students

문화 스키마 참조가 초등학생의 경관 인지에 미치는 영향

홍태완, 최재영

Taewan Hong, Jaeyung Choi

2022. pp. 67~83
PDF Citation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of cultural schema reference on elementary school students’ landscape cognition. To this end, a landscape cognition test tool using ‘spot-the-different task’ was produced, and two of experimental research were conducted for elementary school students. To activate students’ cultural schema reference, comparative and contrasting reference phrases such as ‘similar to’ or ‘different from’ were presented. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that referring to the cultural schema as a visual guideline for students cognitively helped them understand the new cultural landscape. Based on these results, this study intends to provide a teaching and learning method in which students can actively interpret visual material in geography education.
Keywords
Cultural schema reference
Landscape cognition
Spot-the-different task
Visual material
Geography education
본 연구의 목적은 문화 스키마 참조가 초등학생의 경관인지에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위하여 ‘다른 그림 찾기(spot-the-different task)’를 활용한 경관인지 검사도구를 제작하고, 초등학생을 대상으로 크게 두 가지 방식의 실험연구를 수행하였다. 학생들의 문화 스키마 참조를 활성화시키기 위하여 각 방식에 따라 ‘OO과 비슷한∼’ 또는 ‘OO과 다른∼’과 같이 비교 참조문구와 대조 참조문구를 변형하여 제시하였다. 연구 결과 학생들이 문화 스키마를 참조하는 것은 시각적 가이드라인으로 새로운 문화 경관을 이해하는데 인지적인 도움을 주는 것으로 확인되었다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 지리교육에서 학생들이 시각자료를 능동적으로 해석할 수 있는 교수학습방법을 제안하고자 한다.
키워드
문화 스키마 참조
경관인지
다른 그림 찾기
시각자료
지리교육
References
  1. 곽영미, 2018, “한국-외국 유사성 강조가 학습 동기에 미치는 영향,” 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  2. 교육부, 2021, ｢초등학교 6학년 2학기 사회｣, 세종: 교육부.
  3. 국립국어원, 1999, ｢표준국어대사전｣, 서울: 두산동아.
  4. 김기남, 2012, “경관에 대한 친숙성을 달리하는 언어정보에 따른 선호도와 공간적 패턴인지의 차이연구,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 20(1), 95-110.
  5. 김다원, 2021, “글로벌 사회의 객관적 인식을 위한 초등 지리교육과정의 보완적 구성 방안 연구,” 한국지리학회지, 10(1), 19-36.
  6. 김민성･김종근, 2021, “탐구적, 다감각적 지리답사 전략-부산시 영도를 사례로,” 한국사진지리학회지, 31(1), 56-74.
  7. 김종하･조은길･반영선, 2012, “공간의 시각적 이해과정에 나타난 주시유형에 관한 연구: 공공공간의 로비를 중심으로,” 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 21(2), 92-100.
  8. 김종욱･이민부･공우석･김태호･강철성･박경･박병익･박희두･성효현･손명원･양해근･이승호･최영은, 2008, ｢한국의 자연지리｣, 서울: 서울대학교출판부.
  9. 봉미미･김성일･JohnmarshallReeve･임효진･이우걸･Yi Jiang･김진호･김혜진･노아름･노언경･백선희･송주연･신지연･안현선･우연경･원성준･이계형･이민혜･이선경･이선영･이지수･정윤경･Catherine Cho･황아름, 2012, “SMILES (Student Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales): 학습환경에서의 학생동기척도,” 고려대두뇌동기연구소 홈페이지, https://bmri.korea.ac.kr/korean/research/assessment_scales/list.html?id=assessment에서 인출.
  10. 서태열, 2005, ｢지리교육학의 이해｣, 서울: 한울아카데미.
  11. 안종욱, 2011, “Bandura의 관찰학습 이론에 기반한 미디어 자료의 지리교육적 함의,” 한국사진지리학회지, 21(2), 209-224.
  12. 양병일, 2021, “지리적 사고의 이해를 위한 인지 전략 모델의 제안,” 한국지리학회지, 10(2), 193-206.
  13. 양자연, 2020, “감각･지각적 요소를 중심으로 한 “지리학습스타일” 척도 작성,” 한국지리학회지, 9(1), 37-49.
  14. 오성주, 2019, ｢지각의 기술: 지각심리학의 실습적 이해｣, 서울: 서울대학교출판문화원.
  15. 옥한석, 2008, “사진 예술 작품을 통한 지리경관 읽기,” 한국사진지리학회지, 18(4), 39-49.
  16. 이경한, 2006, “초등학생들의 세계 이해도 발달,” 한국지리환경교육학회지, 14(4), 289-298.
  17. 이기영, 2009, “중학교 과학 교과서에 사용된 시각자료의 유형, 기능 및 구조 분석: 제 7 차 교육과정 지구과학 내용을 중심으로,” 한국지구과학회지, 30(7), 897-908.
  18. 이정모･강은주･김민식･감기택･김정오･박태진･신현정･이광오･김영진･도경수･이영애･박주용･곽호환･박창호･이재식, 2013, ｢인지심리학｣, 서울: 학지사.
  19. 조철기, 2013, “비주얼 리터러시에 기반한 사진 활용 지리수업 방법,” 한국사진지리학회지, 23(1), 13-23.
  20. 홍태완, 2020, “장소 스키마 참조가 경관인지와 학습동기에 미치는 영향,” 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  21. An, S., 2013, Schema Theory in Reading, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130-134.
  22. Antrop, M., 2005, Why landscapes of the past are important for the future, Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2), 21-34.
  23. Arnheim, R., 1969, Visual thinking, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  24. Augoustinos, M. and Walker, I., 1995, Social Cognition: An integrated introduction, London: Sage Publications.
  25. Bae, G. and Kim, D.Y., 2014, The effects of offering menu information on perceived waiting time, Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 23(7), 746-767.
  26. Barsalou, L.W. and Sewell, D.R., 1985, Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories, Journal of Memory and Language, 24(6), 646-665.
  27. Bartlett, F.C., 1932, Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Black, J.S. and Mendenhall, M., 1990, Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research, Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 113-136.
  29. Bobrow, D.G. and Norman, D.A., 1975, Some principles of memory schemata, in Bobrow, D.G. and Collins, A., eds., Representation and understanding, Massachusetts: Academic Press, 131-149.
  30. Briñol, P., Gascó, M., Petty, R.E., and Horcajo, J., 2013, Treating thoughts as material objects can increase or decrease their impact on evaluation, Psychological Science, 24(1), 41-47.
  31. Cantor, N. and Mischel, W., 1979, Prototypes in Person Perception, in Berkowitz, L., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Massachusetts: Academic Press, 12, 3-52.
  32. Carrell, P.L., 1988, Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading, in Carrell, P.L., Devine, J., and Eskey, D.E., Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 101-113.
  33. Catling, S. and Martin, F., 2011, Contesting powerful knowledge: The primary geography curriculum as an articulation between academic and children’s (ethno-)geographies, Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 317-335.
  34. Choi, G.W., Kim, S., Kim, J., Lee, I., and Kim, J., 2012, Qualitative Cross-Cultural Study on the Expression and Perception of Digital Images: Focusing on Cultural Schema, International Journal of Contents, 8(4), 78-87.
  35. Coco, M.I., Malcolm, G.L., and Keller, F., 2014, The interplay of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms in visual guidance during object naming, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1096-1120.
  36. Connor, C.E., Egeth, H.E., and Yantis, S., 2004, Visual attention: bottom-up versus top-down, Current Biology, 14(19), R850-R852.
  37. Cuba, L. and Hummon, D.M., 1993, A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region, Sociological Quarterly, 34(1), 111-131.
  38. De Botton, A., 2008, The art of travel, London: Penguin Books.
  39. Gertsen, M.C., 1990, Intercultural competence and expatriates, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(3), 341-362.
  40. Ghosh, V.E. and Gilboa, A., 2014, What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature, Neuropsychologia, 53, 104-114.
  41. Gioia, D.A. and Manz, C.C., 1985, Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning, Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 527-539.
  42. Gioia, D.A. and Poole, P.P., 1984, Scripts in organizational behavior, Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 449-459.
  43. Goryunova, E. and Jenkins, D.M., 2017, Global leadership education: Upping the Game, Journal of Leadership Education, 16(4), 76-93.
  44. Gollnick, D.M. and Chinn, P.C., 2002, Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society, 8th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  45. Gregory, R.L., 1970, The intelligent eye, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  46. Hamann, S.B., 1990, Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 970-977.
  47. Hampton, J.A., 1981, An investigation of the nature of abstract concepts, Memory & Cognition, 9(2), 149-156.
  48. Harris, S.G., 1994, Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective, Organization Science, 5(3), 309-321.
  49. Henderson, J.M., Brockmole, J.R., Castelhano, M.S., and Mack, M., 2007, Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes, in Van Gompel, R.P., Fischer, M.H., Murray, W.S., and Hill, R., eds., Eye movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, Oxford: Elsevier, 537-562.
  50. Jin, J.H., Shin, H.J., and Choi, J.J., 2013, SPOID: a system to produce spot-the-difference puzzle images with difficulty, The Visual Computer, 29(6), 481-489.
  51. Kaplan, S., 1987, Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective, Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3-32.
  52. Keengwe, J., 2010, Fostering cross cultural competence in preservice teachers through multicultural education experiences, Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(3), 197-204.
  53. Kintsch, W., 2005, An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective, Discourse Processes, 39(2-3), 125-128.
  54. Klippel, A. and Winter, S., 2005, Structural salience of landmarks for route directions, in Cohn, A.G. and Mark, D.M., eds., Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, 3693, 347-362.
  55. Kuperman, J.C., 2003, Using cognitive schema theory in the development of public relations strategy: Exploring the case of firms and financial analysts following acquisition announcements, Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 117-150.
  56. Lawrence, R.J., 1987, Housing, dwellings and homes: Design theory, research and practice, Great Britain: John Wiley and Sons. Ltd.
  57. Lew, A.R. and Howe, M.L., 2017, Out of place, out of mind: Schema-driven false memory effects for object-location bindings, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(3), 404-421.
  58. Lin, P.H., Chen, H.J., and Wang, Z.Q., 2021, Visual Performance Assessment of Videos—A Case Study of the Game “Spot the Difference”, Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7628.
  59. Lindsay, P.H. and Norman, D.A., 1977, Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
  60. Lord, R.G. and Kernan, M.C., 1987, Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 265-277.
  61. Lotz, A.D., 2021, In between the global and the local: Mapping the geographies of Netflix as a multinational service, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 195-215.
  62. Malcolm, I.G. and Sharifian, F., 2002, Aspects of Aboriginal English oral discourse: An application of cultural schema theory, Discourse Studies, 4(2), 169-181.
  63. Markus, H., 1977, Self-schemata and processing information about the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63-78.
  64. Martin, J., 1982, Accounts and scripts in organizational settings, in Hastorf, A.H. and Isen, A.M., eds., Cognitive social psychology, New York: Elsevier, 255-305.
  65. Matsumoto, D. and Juang, L., 2008, Culture and Psychology, Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  66. McCort, D.J. and Malhotra, N.K., 1993, Culture and consumer behavior: toward an understanding of cross-cultural consumer behavior in international marketing, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 91-127.
  67. McLane, A.S. and Hoag, J.E., 1943, The curve of forgetting in the first three minutes, The American Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 105-110.
  68. Miller, G.A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
  69. Nickles, T., 2000, Kuhnian puzzle solving and schema theory, Philosophy of Science, 67, S242-S255.
  70. Nisbett, R.E. and Norenzayan, A., 2002, Culture and Cognition, in Pashler, H. and Medin, D., eds., Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: Memory and cognitive processes, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 561-597.
  71. Nishida, H., 1999, A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(5), 753-777.
  72. Nishiguchi, S., Yamada, M., Fukutani, N., Adachi, D., Tashiro, Y., Hotta, T., Morino, S., Aoyama, T., and Tsuboyama, T., 2015, Spot the Difference for Cognitive Decline: A quick memory and attention test for screening cognitive decline, Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 6(1), 9-14.
  73. Ohta, H., 2001, A phenomenological approach to natural landscape cognition, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 387-403.
  74. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M.S., and Henderson, J.M., 2003, Top-down control of visual attention in object detection, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing(Cat. No. 03CH37429), 1, I-253-I-256.
  75. Önal, G.K. and Turgut, H., 2017, Cultural schema and design activity in an architectural design studio, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 183-203.
  76. Park, S., Kim, H., Han, S., and Kwon, Y., 2020, Landscape design methodology as perceived through memory schema with user experience, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(2), 282-296.
  77. Pezzulo, G. and Calvi, G., 2007, Modulatory Influence of Motivations on a Schema-Based Architecture: A Simulative Study, in Paiva, A., Prada, R., and Picard, R.W., eds., Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction: Second International Conference, ACII 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, 4738, 374-385.
  78. Piaget, J. and Cook, M.T., 1952, The origins of intelligence in children, New York: International Universities Press.
  79. Pichert, J.W. and Anderson, R.C., 1977, Taking different perspectives on a story, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 309-315.
  80. Plata, M., 2011, Cultural Schemata-Yardstick for Measuring Others: Implications for Teachers, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(2), 117-123.
  81. Reber, A.S. and Reber, E.S., 2001, The Penguin dictionary of psychology, 3rd ed., London: Penguin Books.
  82. Reed, S.K., 2012, Cognition: theories and applications, 9th ed., Boston, MA: Cengage Learning(박권생 역, 2014, ｢인지심리학: 이론과 적용｣, 서울: 센게이지러닝코리아).
  83. Regan, C.L. and Horn, S.A., 2005, To nature or not to nature: Associations between environmental preferences, mood states and demographic factors, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 57-66.
  84. Rosch, E. and Mervis, C.B., 1975, Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605.
  85. Seamon, D., 1982, The phenomenological contribution to environmental psychology, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(2), 119-140.
  86. Sekaran, U., 1983, Methodological and theoretical issues and advancements in cross-cultural research, Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 61-73.
  87. Sharifian, F., 2003, On cultural conceptualisations, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(3), 187-207.
  88. Sharifian, F. and Palmer, G.B., eds., 2007, Applied cultural linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  89. Shaw, R. and Pittenger, J., 1977, Perceiving the face of change in changing faces: Implications for a theory of object perception, in Shaw R. and Bransford J., eds., Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 103-132.
  90. Shi, J., Honjo, T., Zhang, K., and Furuya, K., 2020, Using virtual reality to assess landscape: A comparative study between on-site survey and virtual reality of aesthetic preference and landscape cognition, Sustainability, 12(7), 2875.
  91. Shore, B., 1998, Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  92. Sun, F., 2014, The application of schema theory in teaching college English writing, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1476-1482.
  93. Taylor, S.E., 1981, Schematic bases of social information processing, Social Cognition, 89-134.
  94. Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R., 2009, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, London: Penguin Books.
  95. Turgut, H., 1990, A Method for the determination of culture behavior-space interaction system, Ph.D. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.
  96. Um, K., Hu, X., Wang, B., and Thuerey, N., 2021, Spot the difference: Accuracy of numerical simulations via the human visual system, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 18(2), 1-15.
  97. Waddill, P.J. and McDaniel, M.A., 1998, Distinctiveness effects in recall, Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 108-120.
  98. Zigmunde, D., Ņitavska, N., Vugule, K., Storie, J., Katlapa, A., Kalniņa, A., and Mengots, A., 2016, Landscape cognition, Landscape Architecture and Art, 8(8), 31-42.
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 11
  • No :1
  • Pages :67~83
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.11.1.5
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close