All Issue

2023 Vol.12, Issue 4 Preview Page

Research Article

Critical Review of the Urban Spatial Structure Model in Southeast Asia and Exploration of the Meaning of Geography Education at High School in World Geography

동남아시아 도시 공간구조 모델에 대한 비판적 고찰과 고등학교 ｢세계지리｣에서의 지리교육적 의미 탐색

신정엽1†

Jungyeop Shin1†

1서울대학교 지리교육과 교수
1Professor, Department of Geography Education, Seoul National University
31 December 2023. pp. 611~627
PDF Citation
Abstract
The urban spatial structure in Southeast Asia has different characteristics from the Western ones, and the relevant research has been implemented. This paper tried to review the models and concepts for explaining the unique urban spatial structures in Southeast Asia, and then to evaluate their usefulness and values. The research for urban structure in Southeast Asia has been initiated since McGee’s model (1967), and then Ford’s model (1993). After then, several models and concepts such as Extended Metropolitan Region (EMR) model, Peri-urban region, Peri-urban interface have been proposed in order to explain the dynamic urban spatial structures in Southeast Asian city. Especially, the changing transition region between the urban core in the metropolitan region and traditional rural region has been explained with “desakota” concepts. Then, based on the critical review urban spatial structure model in Southeast Asia, I tried to explore the meanings on the geography education at high school level. As a result of reviewing World Geography textbook at high school level, the introduction of Southeast Asian cities, with more actively interactions and visiting recently, was more relatively rare than that of cities in the other world. Further the proposed model in the World Geography textbook was not correct, and has serious problems in terms of recency and relevancy.
Keywords
Southeast Asian City
Urban spatial Structure
Urban spatial model
McGee‘s model
Desakota
Extended metropolitan region model
남아시아 도시 공간구조는 고유한 지리적, 역사적 특성으로 인해 서구 도시와 다른 특성을 지녔으며, 이와 관련한 연구들이 수행되었다. 본 연구는 동남아시아 도시 공간구조를 설명하는 모델과 개념을 비판적으로 검토하고, 그 유용성과 가치를 탐색하고자 하였다. 동남아시아 도시구조 연구는 McGee의 모델(1967)에 의해 본격화되었으며, Ford의 모델(1993)이 이어졌다. 이후 빠르게 변화되는 동남아시아의 대도시지역을 설명하기 위해 광역 대도시지역 모델(Extended Metropolitan Region: EMR) 모델, 도시 주변부 지역(Peri-urban region), 도시 주변부 인터페이스(Peri-urban interface)의 개념이 제시되었다. 특히, 기존 동남아시아 대도시지역의 중심부와 주변 농촌 사이의 점이지역은 데사코타(desakota) 개념으로 설명되었다. 그리고 동남아시아 도시 공간구조 모델에 대한 비판적 고찰을 토대로, 고등학교 지리교육에서의 의미를 탐색하였다. 고등학교 ｢세계지리｣의 분석 결과, 최근 우리나라와 활발히 교류하고 방문하는 동남아시아 도시공간 모델의 소개는 다른 대륙보다 적을 뿐만 아니라, 제시된 모델도 정확하지 않거나 최신성, 적절성에서 문제가 확인되었다.
키워드
동남아시아 도시
도시 공간구조
도시 공간모델
McGee의 모델
데사코타
광역 대도시지역 모델
References
  1. 교육과학기술부, 2009, ｢사회과 교육과정｣, 교육과학기술부 고시 제2009-10호.
  2. 교육과학기술부, 2012, ｢사회과 교육과정｣, 교육과학기술부 고시 제2012-14호.
  3. 교육부, 2015, ｢사회과 교육과정｣, 교육과학기술부 고시 제2015-74호.
  4. 권동희･안재섭･오정준･신현종･조지욱･홍석민･유상철･정명섭, 2012, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 천재교육.
  5. 권동희･안재섭･오정준･이승철･신현종･조지욱･신승진, 2014, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 천재교육.
  6. 권태호, 2003, “동남아시아의 거대도시와 지속가능개발,” 아시아연구, 6(2), 131-158.
  7. 권태호･신철경, 2006, “동남아시아 대도시 종합계획의 비판적 고찰: 서구의 이론과 지역적 현실의 불화?,” 아시아연구, 9(1), 23-50.
  8. 김종욱･주경식･서정훈･김태환･박용우･장성문･김남기･최재희･박재현･김선아, 2014, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 교학사.
  9. 박철웅･조성호･강은희･이강준･홍철희･박병철･김지현･백승진･최재희, 2019, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 미래엔.
  10. 신정엽, 2022a, “동남아시아의 지리적 특성과 도시화의 비판적 논의 검토,” 지리교육논집, 66, 1-22.
  11. 신정엽, 2022b, “‘자바의 파리’: 반둥 도시공간의 역동성,” 한국지리학회지, 11(2), 219-236. 10.25202/JAKG.11.2.3
  12. 신정엽･이정식･이경희･양희경･김봉수･유상철･박재현･박천영･박철진, 2019, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 천재교과서.
  13. 위상복･최규학･유성종･강성열･최희만･우연섭･이우평･이훈정･조철민･최종필･김지현･유진상･강재호･이두현･윤정현, 2014, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 비상교육.
  14. 최막중･김다현, 2019, “서울, 자카르타, 마닐라, 방콕 대도시권의 도시확산 비교 분석,” 국토계획, 54(1), 30-39. 10.17208/jkpa.2019.02.54.1.30
  15. 최병천･유성종･강성열･김턱일･우연섭･이우평･김시구･이훈정･엄주환･남길수･김차곤･이화영･이두현･강문철･윤정현･김진형･방완석, 2019, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 비상.
  16. 최원회･이민부･이영민･박선희･양희경･2012, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 교학사.
  17. 한광야･곽혜빈, 2018, “필리핀 마닐라의 도시성장 특성에 대한 해석: 운하항구에서 광역도시로의 변화 형태를 중심으로,“ 한국도시설계학회지, 19(6), 65-82. 10.38195/judik.2018.12.19.6.65
  18. 한광야･신재영･하성현, 2020, “태국 방콕의 도시성장 특성에 관한 해석: 운하항구에서 다핵도시로의 변화를 중심으로,” 한국도시설계학회지, 21(6), 49-67. 10.38195/judik.2020.12.21.6.49
  19. 황병삼･천종호･이준구･이해창･천재호･강재호, 2019, ｢고등학교 세계지리｣, 서울: 금성출판사.
  20. Allen, A., 2003, Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field, Environmental Planning and Management, 15(1), 135-147. 10.1630/095624703101286402
  21. Atkinson, A., 1999, Principles and Components of a Strategic EPM process relevant to the peri-urban interface (PUI), Research paper, Peri-urban research project team, University College London.
  22. Breese, G. ed., 1966, Urbanization in Newly Developing Economics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  23. Browder, J., Bohland, J., and Scarpadi, J., 1995, Patterns of development on the metropolitan fringe: Urban fringe expansion in Bangkok, Jakarta and Santiago, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), 310-327. 10.1080/01944369508975645
  24. Brunn, S. Hays-Mitchell, M., Zeigler, D., and Graybil, J. eds., 2016, The Cities of the World: Regional Patterns and Urban Environments, 6th edition, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  25. Budiyantini, Y. and Pratiwi, V., 2016, Peri-urban typology of Bandung metropolitan area, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 833-837. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.152
  26. Butsch, C. and Heinkel, S.B., 2020, Periurban transformations in the global south and their impact on water-based livelihoods, Water, 12(2), 458-475. 10.3390/w12020458
  27. Caruso, G., 2001, Peri-urbanisation: The situation in Europe, A bibliographical note and survey of studies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Italy and the Nordic countries, Report prepared for DATAR, France.
  28. Chen, Y., Wen, Y., and Li, Z., 2017, From blueprint to action: The transformation of the planning paradigm, Cities, 60, 454-465. 10.1016/j.cities.2016.04.010
  29. Danielaini, T., Maheshwari, B., and Hagare, D., 2018, Defining rural-urban interfaces for understanding ecohydrological processes in West Java, Indonesia: Part I. Development of methodology to delineate peri-urban areas, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18, 22-36. 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.11.006
  30. Dick, H. and Rimmer, P., 1998, Beyond the third world city: The new urban geography of South-east Asia, Urban Studies, 35(12), 2303-2321. 10.1080/0042098983890
  31. Dobby, E.H., 1950, Southeast Asia, London: University of London Press.
  32. Douglass, M., 2000, Mega-urban regions and world city formation: Globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy in Pacific Asia, Urban Studies, 37(12), 2315-2335. 10.1080/00420980020002823
  33. Ernawati, R., Santosa, H., and Setijanti, P., 2013, Facing urban vulnerability through kampung development, case study of kampungs in Surabaya, Indonesia, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-6. 10.11648/j.hss.20130101.11
  34. Fireman, T., 1996, Urban development in Bandung metropolitan region: A transformation to a desa-kota region, Tommy Third World Planning Review, 18(1), 1-21. 10.3828/twpr.18.1.t537086351458357
  35. Fisher, C.A., 1964, Southeast Asia: A Social, Economic and Political Geography, London: Methuen.
  36. Ford, L.R., 1993, A model of Indonesian city structure, Geographical Review, 83(4), 374-396. 10.2307/215821
  37. Fouberg, E., Murphy, A., and De Blij, H., 2015, Human Geography: People, Place, and Culture, 11th edition, New York: Wiley.
  38. Fryer, D., 1968, Reviewed work: The Southeast Asian City, Economic Geography, 44(3), 276-278. 10.2307/142769
  39. Ginsburg, N., 1991, Extended Metropolitan Regions in Asia: A new spatial paradigm, in Ginsburg, N., Koppel, B., and McGee, T. eds., The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 27-46. 10.1515/9780824841904-006
  40. Ginsburg, N., Koppel, B., and McGee, T. eds., 1991, The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824841904
  41. Gottdiener, M., Budd, L., and Lehtovuori, P., 2016, Key Concepts in Urban Studies, 2nd edition, London: Sage(신정엽･김감영･김영호 역, 2019, ｢도시 공간을 보다｣, 시그마프레스).
  42. Gourou, P., 1940, Land Utilization in French Indochina, New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.
  43. Griffin, E. and Ford, L., 1980, A model of Latin American city structure, Geographical Review, 70(4), 397-422. 10.2307/214076
  44. Houston, P., 2005, Re-valuing the fringe: Some findings on the value of agricultural production in Australia’s peri-urban regions, Geographical Research, 43(2), 209-223. 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00314.x
  45. Iaquinta, D. and Drescher, A., 2000, Defining peri-urban understanding rural-urban linkages and their connection to institutional context paper presented ata the Tenth World Congress of the International Rural Sociology Association, Rio de Janeiro.
  46. Johnson, G. and Woon, Y., 1997, Rural development patterns in post-reform China: The Pearl River delta region in the 1990s, Development and Change, 28(4), 731-752. 10.1111/1467-7660.00062
  47. Kelly, P., 2007, Geographer, Asianist, urbanist: Celebrating the scholarship of Terry McGee, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(2), 250-253. 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2007.00344.x
  48. Lin, G., 2001, Metropolitan development in a transitional socialist economy: Spatial restructuring in the Pearl River Delta, China, Urban Studies, 38(3), 383-406. 10.1080/00420980120027429
  49. Lo, F. and Yeung, Y. eds., 1995, Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia, Tokyo: United Nations Unviersity Press.
  50. McGee, T.G., 1964, The rural-urban continuum debates: The preindustrial city and rural-urban migration, Pacific Viewpoint, 5(2), 159-181. 10.1111/apv.52003
  51. McGee, T.G., 1967, The Southeast Asian City: A Social Geography of the Primate Cities of Southeast Asia, New York: Praeger.
  52. McGee, T.G., 1991a, Presidential address: Eurocentrism in geography: The case of Asian urbanization, Canadian Geographer, 35(4), 332-344. 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1991.tb01298.x
  53. McGee, T.G., 1991b, The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis, in Ginsburg, N., Koppel, B., and McGee, T.G. eds., The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 3-26. 10.1515/9780824841904-005
  54. McGee, T.G., 1995a, Metrofitting the emerging mega-urban regions of ASEAN: An overview, in McGee, T.G. and Robinson, I. eds., The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia, Vancouver: UBC Press, 3-26. 10.59962/9780774854351-004
  55. McGee, T.G., 1995b, Eurocentrism and Geography, in Crush, J. ed., Power of Development, London: Routledge, 192-207.
  56. McGee, T.G., 2002, Reconstructing “the Southeast Asian city” in an era of volatile globalization, in Bunnell, T., Drummond, L., and Ho, K. eds., Critical Reflections on Cities in Southeast Asia, New York: Brill Academic Publishers, 31-53. 10.1163/9789004488236_008
  57. McGee, T.G., 2009, The spatiality of urbanization: The policy challenges of mega-urban and desakota regions of Southeast Asia, UNU-IAS Working Paper, no. 161.
  58. McGee, T.G., 2014, The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis, in Brenner, N., Implosions / Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, Berlin: Jobis, 121-137. 10.1515/9783868598933-010
  59. McGee, T.G. and Shaharudin, I., 2016, Reimagining the “Peri-urban” in the mega-urban regions of Southeast Asia, in Maheshwari, B., Singh, V., and Thoradeniya, B. eds., Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities, New York: Springer, 499-516. 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_30
  60. McGregor, D., Simon, D., and Thompson, D., 2006, The Peri-Urban Interface: Approaches to Sustainable Natural and Human Resource Use, London: Earthscan.
  61. Moench, M. and Gyawali, D., 2008, Desakota: Reinterpreting the Urban-rural Continuum, Final Report Desakota II A. Natural Environment Research Council, http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/EnvRes/Desakota-Part-II-A.pdf.
  62. Narain, V. and Nischal, S., 2007, The peri-urban interface in Shahpur Khurd and Karnera, India, Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 261-273. 10.1177/0956247807076905
  63. Ortega, A., 2012, Desakota and beyond: Neoliberal production of suburban space in Manila’s fringe, Urban Geography, 33(8), 1118-1143. 10.2747/0272-3638.33.8.1118
  64. Osborne, M., 2016, Southeast Asia: An Introductory History, 12th edition, London: Allen & Unwin.
  65. Qadeer, M., 2000, Ruralopolises: The spatial organization and residential land economy of high-density rural region in South Asia, Urban Studies, 37(9), 1583-1603. 10.1080/00420980020080271
  66. Rakodi, C., 1999, Poverty in the Peri-urban interface, Natural Resources Systems Programme (NRSP) Research Advances, No. 5.
  67. Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., and Nielsen, T, 2013, The dynamics of peri-urbanization, in Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., and Nielsen, T. eds., Peri-urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe, Berlin: Springer, 13-44. 10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2
  68. Rigg, J., 1997, Southeast Asia: The Human Landscape of Modernization and Development, New York: Routlege. 10.4324/9780203437889
  69. Rimmer, P.J., 2002, Overview: Restructuring Chinese space in the new millennium, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 43(1), 1-8. 10.1111/1467-8373.00001
  70. Robequain, C., 1952, L’Indochine, Paris: Armand Colin.
  71. Robinson, I., 1995, Emerging spatial patterns in ASEAN mega-urban regions: Alternative strategies, in McGee, T.G. and Robinson, I. eds., 1995, The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia, Vancouver: UBC Press, 78-108. 10.59962/9780774854351-007
  72. Simon, D., 2008, Urban environments: Issues of the peri-urban fringe, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 167-185. 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.093240
  73. Simon, D. and Adam-Bradford, A., 2016, Archaeology and contemporary dynamics for more sustainable, resilient cities in the peri-urban interface in Maheshwari, B., Singh, V., and Thoradeniya, B. eds., Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities, New York: Springer, 57-83. 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_5
  74. Sit, V., 1996, Mega-city, extended metropolitan region, desakota, and exo-urbanization: An introduction, Asian Geographer, 15(1-2), 1-14. 10.1080/10225706.1996.9684009
  75. Spencer, J., 1955, Asia East by South, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  76. Sui, D. and Zeng, H., 2001, Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia’s emerging desakota regions: A case study in Shenzhen, Landscape and Urban Planning, 53, 37-52. 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00136-5
  77. Tyner, J. and Ortega, A.A., 2016, Cities of Southeast Asia, in Brunn, S. Hays-Mitchell, M., Zeigler, D., and Graybil, J. eds., 2016, The Cities of the World: Regional Patterns and Urban Environments, 6th edition, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 422-463.
  78. UN, 2019, UN World Population Prospects 2018, Department of Economic and Social Fairs, UN, New York.
  79. Varkey, A. and Manasi, S., 2019, A review of peri-urban definitions, land use changes and challenges to development, Urban India, 39(1), 96-111.
  80. Webster, D., 2002, On the edge: Shaping the future of peri-urban East Asia, Research Paper, The Asia/Pacific Research Center, Stanford University.
  81. Webster, D., Cai, J., Muller, L., and Luo, B., 2003, Emerging third stage peri-urbanization: Functional specialization in the Hangzhou peri-urban region, Research Monograph. Stanford, CA: Asia-‐Pacific Research Center, Stanford University.
  82. Wernstedt, F. and Spencer, J., 1967, The Philippines Island World: A Physical, Cultural and Regional Geography, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  83. Wertheim, W. ed., 1958, The Indonesian Town: Studies in Urban Sociology, The Hague: W. van Hoeve Ltd.
  84. Wu, B., 2009, Modeling the dynamics of desakota regions: Global-local nexus in the Taipei metropolitan area, Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
  85. Wu, B. and Sui, D., 2016, Modeling impacts of globalization on desakota regions: A case study of Taipei metropolitan area, Environment and Planning B, 43(2), 320-340. 10.1177/0265813515605216
Information
  • Publisher :The Association of Korean Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리학회지
  • Volume : 12
  • No :4
  • Pages :611~627
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.12.4.6
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close